<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  September 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Preserve old-growth forests

By Gray Brokaw, VANCOUVER
Published: September 25, 2024, 6:00am

I am writing to urge the Forest Service to ban logging and development of Washington’s oldest trees on federal land. Some of Washington’s most iconic mature and old-growth forests are at risk of degradation despite standing on federal lands.

These forests, rich in biodiversity and storing vast amounts of carbon, are vital for combating climate change. We’re facing twin crises — climate change and biodiversity loss. To combat both, we need more older forests. Despite their ecological significance, they remain on the chopping block.

Environment America has gathered over 250,000 public comments from concerned citizens calling on the Forest Service to heed the overwhelming public support and update its rules – enacting stronger protections for old- and mature-growth forests.

Old-growth forests have been around longer than most people. If the Forest Service’s proposal is strong enough, they’ll be around for longer than we will. We’ll continue to fight on their behalf, because old-growth trees are worth more standing.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...