The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
Because this is campaign season, there’s rarely a day that I don’t receive an email, tweet or text from someone explaining the importance of young voters in the election.
On the rare day that doesn’t occur, someone on a cable news talking-head panel or some internet pundit is discussing how this candidate or that campaign needs to go after younger votes.
Because I was born the year the Spokane Coliseum was built, most voters are younger than me. But what these deep political thinkers usually mean in this context are voters of Generation Z — who may have to Google “When was Spokane Coliseum built?” or even “What was Spokane Coliseum?”
Gen Z, for those unsure of the demarcation lines for the various generations, are those born between 1995 and 2009. They come after millennials, born between 1980 and 1994, Generation X, born between 1965 and 1979, and baby boomers born between 1946 and 1964.
Those born before 1946 are the so-called Silent Generation, preceded by the Greatest Generation that lived through the Great Depression and fought or worked through WWII. They are dwindling at such a rate that they are generally lumped together as “older voters.”
Gen Z is all the rage now in discussing where candidates might find votes.
A result of this push may be found in recent registration numbers from the Washington Elections Office. Of the 29,610 registrations between July 26 and Aug. 26 — roughly the month after President Joe Biden announced he wasn’t running for reelection through the Democratic National Convention — some 44 percent were in Generation Z.
This despite the fact that only people from 12 of that generation’s 14 birth years are old enough to vote.
But the talk generally moves past the numbers to how candidates might appeal to Gen Z, with caveats these young voters should not be viewed as a monolithic voting bloc and are motivated by many different issues.
It’s good advice, albeit fairly axiomatic, as no generation should be viewed as monolithic or motivated by a single set of issues. What may be bad advice, however, is to put an inordinate amount of time and energy into registering voters and counting on their participation in the election.
That noise you just heard was some Gen Z-er saying “OK, Boomer.” To which I say this is a quantitative, not a qualitative, analysis. It’s based partly on a breakdown of the Aug. 6 primary turnout by age, from a set of figures from the state Elections Office.
That data show Gen Z voters are the smallest cohort of voters in the four main age groups, with just under 824,000 registered. Boomers are the largest, with over 1.34 million, followed by millennials with about 1.28 million and Gen X with almost 1.11 million. Again, Gen Z is at a slight disadvantage, because two years of their demographic segment is not eligible.
Turnout for Gen Z averaged 19 percent, compared to 27 percent for millennials, 39 percent for Gen X and 62 percent for boomers. Turnout for the older generations was an impressive 68 percent, although their numbers are down to about 315,000. Turnout for every group was low, which is usual for a primary. But it increased with age.
This isn’t surprising. All previous generations had low turnout numbers in their teens and 20s. They began voting in greater numbers when they started getting married, having kids, getting good jobs, going to parent-teacher conferences, buying property and paying taxes — in other words, when they started coming to the conclusion that they had a stake in who got elected.
So when I hear candidates are courting the youth vote and Gen Z is registering in large numbers, I’m slightly skeptical, because math favors later generations. History suggests they won’t be a major factor, because some of those who register now won’t vote in November and most who have been on the rolls for a couple of years won’t send in their ballot, either.
For those saying, “OK, Boomer,” I’d be happy for math, history — and me — to be proven wrong.
Morning Briefing Newsletter
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.
