<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  November 21 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Old-growth forests key to future

By Russell Ford, Vancouver
Published: October 21, 2024, 6:00am

I found the article on the value of Washington’s forests wonderfully uplifting and applaud the editor for putting it on the front page (“Washington’s old-growth forests capture carbon better than nearly any other,” The Columbian, Oct. 14). I wish it could be shouted from the rooftops for all to hear.

The very idea that the forests of the world are capturing one-third of the world’s carbon emissions is incredible, but it begs the question, “Why in this world are we still arguing about whether or not to cut into the last remaining old-growth forests to make a buck?” California is down to less than 5 percent of its once-mighty redwood forests.

Telling is that the only old-growth forests left in our country are in parks or owned and managed by the federal government. This speaks to the need for collective regulation to guard against our propensity to foul our own nest through greed and reckless power grabbing. It is the old growth that may someday play a decisive role in providing future generations with clean air and a balanced ecosystem.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...