<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  October 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Politics / Clark County Politics

Clark County Council says Vancouver’s police levy would create more work for the county without paying for it

Adding more officers would create unfunded work for corrections and the jail; council adopts resolution explaining costs

By Becca Robbins, Columbian staff reporter
Published: October 18, 2024, 1:47pm
Updated: October 18, 2024, 3:11pm

The Clark County Council on Friday adopted a resolution warning that passage of Vancouver’s Proposition 4, which would raise property taxes to add 80 new police officers, will create more work for the rest of the criminal justice system without providing money to pay for it.

Vancouver’s measure appears on the Nov. 5 ballot. In addition to putting more police on the streets, Vancouver’s proposed levy lid lift would add up to 36 non-sworn positions, form a traffic enforcement camera program, expand the city’s Homeless Assistance and Resources Team (which has two officers) and upgrade equipment.

The measure would increase the city’s 2024 general fund property tax levy by about 41 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value for 2025. The levy collection would increase 5 percent a year for six years. The measure would raise about $15.5 million the first year and about $36 million by 2030, according to the city.

The county’s resolution states the number of judges, attorneys and other employees would need to increase in response to the added officers. The county covers the costs of adjudicating felony cases from all jurisdictions in the county. The county funds Superior, District and juvenile courts; the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office; the Public Defense Office; the Clerk’s Office; and the jail. The county estimates the levy would create a need for additional services that would increase annual costs by 13 percent, or $11.7 million in 2027.

Although Proposition 4 states it will help fund the other services, County Manager Kathleen Otto said that funding will be a very small fraction of what’s needed.

“Their messaging — and I just saw a flyer I think was sent to voters in the community — says it covers the cost for corrections and jail,” Otto said. “It doesn’t.”

The resolution warns, “The law and justice system is currently not financially sustainable and without additional funding from the taxpayers and cities, the law and justice system would fail, resulting in limited positive impact that is desired by increased law enforcement personnel and programs.”

The council voted 4-1 to adopt the resolution, with Glen Yung dissenting.

Officials from the courts and other county agencies plan to discuss how their departments would be impacted by the passage of the city’s ballot measure during a work session Wednesday.

Loading...