<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 22 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Reject Initiative 2124

By Christina Keys, Vancouver
Published: October 14, 2024, 6:00am

Shame on The Columbian for not taking the time to get the facts straight before supporting Initiative 2124 (“No on initiatives 2109 and 2066; yes on 2124,” In Our View, Oct. 5).

This measure is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. It doesn’t give us choices; it takes them away, because making the program optional would bankrupt it, according to independent experts. By destroying a lifeline designed to help during the most challenging time of our lives, I-2124 will harm the more than 820,000 family caregivers in Washington, and millions more who can’t afford or qualify for private long-term care insurance.

Until the need for long-term care happens to you or a loved one, you may prefer to live in denial. But the facts are that all of us either will end up needing help with daily living tasks ourselves as a result of an injury, illness, disease or age, or will become a caregiver for a loved one.

Just ask the more than 49,000 family caregivers in Clark County how state long-term care benefits would help them.

I hope the hardworking people of our county will get the facts and vote “no” on I-2124, protecting an essential resource the vast majority of us will need.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...