<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday,  October 7 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Kent’s answers lead to questions

By Diantha Weilepp, South Bend
Published: October 7, 2024, 6:00am

I asked Joe Kent two important questions directly: Would he approve a national law protecting a woman’s right to an abortion, making health care equal across the nation? His answer: The states handle that now.

This means he is perfectly OK with unequal rights, varying by state. He is OK with women dying from inadequate health care, negligent and fearful doctors and nurses.

And would he deal with the problems at the Supreme Court? His response: What problems?

Either he is totally uninformed about the bribery, the millions accumulated in gifts by Clarence Thomas, the partisan decisions handed down and the real estate deal cut, or he does not care and favors bribery and a lack of ethics.

Is it any wonder his own ethics are questionable?

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...