WASHINGTON — Here’s a look at how area members of Congress voted over the week ending Nov. 15.
Along with roll call votes this week, the House also passed these measures without a vote: the Federal Acquisition Security Council Improvement Act (H.R. 9597), to make changes with respect to the Federal Acquisition Security Council; the Value Over Cost Act (H.R. 9596), to provide best value through the multiple award schedule program; and the Eliminate Useless Reports Act (H.R. 5301), to require agencies to include a list of outdated or duplicative reporting requirements in annual budget justifications.
House
SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS: The House has passed the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 82), sponsored by Rep. Garret Graves, R-La., to repeal measures that reduce Social Security benefits for people who also receive a government pension, or who receive pension or disability funds from an employer that didn’t withhold Social Security taxes for those funds. Graves said the change was a way to end “40 years of treating people differently, discriminating against a certain set of workers” because they worked for the government. An opponent, Rep. John B. Larson, D-Conn., said that by cutting funding available to pay Social Security benefits to the impoverished, the bill would “end up hurting the very people we are sworn to serve, the very people that Social Security was meant to protect.” The vote, on Nov. 12, was 327 yeas to 75 nays, with 1 voting present.
YEAS:
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-3rd
SOCIAL SECURITY AND GOVERNMENT WORKERS: The House has rejected the Equal Treatment of Public Servants Act (H.R. 5342), sponsored by Rep. Jodey C. Arrington, R-Texas. The bill would have changed the funding formula, under Social Security’s windfall elimination provision, for determining the amount of benefits paid to people with certain types of employment histories, mainly in government. Those people would generally receive more benefits. Arrington said the provision “has shortchanged roughly 2 million hardworking public servants,” and the bill would fix that inequity without compromising the financial integrity of the Social Security trust fund. An opponent, Rep. John B. Larson, D-Conn., said that by reducing the pool of money available for other Social Security recipients, it would hurt the 5 million Americans who get less than poverty-level benefits. The vote, on Nov. 12, was 175 yeas to 225 nays, with 1 voting present.