<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Tuesday,  November 5 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Understand meaning of I-2117

By Hal Mathiesen, Vancouver
Published: November 5, 2024, 6:00am

Confused! The article “Costly campaigns and big spenders: Where money is flowing in WA’s elections” (The Columbian, Oct. 30) covers info about Initiative 2117 on the ballot this year.

I-2117 is about maintaining or eliminating the current Climate Commitment Act, which is designed to encourage lowering greenhouse emissions from the highest polluters in the state through a cap-and-trade program. The story states “The most cash is being spent to convince voters to vote ‘no’ on Initiative 2117, which would repeal the state’s Climate Commitment Act.”

Actually, a “no” vote on this issue will keep the Climate Commitment Act in place, not repeal it. The “no” vote will reject Initiative 2117 and keep the Climate Commitment Act in place.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...