<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  June 27 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Camden: Flag disrespect in eye of beholder

By Jim Camden
Published: May 29, 2024, 6:01am

When reports of an upside-down flag flying in the yard of a Supreme Court justice hit the news last week, it reinforced a lesson learned 35 years ago from a local controversy.

The lesson? Anything one does with a flag beyond flying it right-side up at the top of a pole will be labeled as disrespectful by someone. But like beauty, respect for the flag is in the eye of the beholder.

People who agree with Justice Samuel Alito and his conservative stances seem inclined to give him a break on the 2021 incident in which an inverted American flag flew over his front yard for several days after the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. They’ll probably accept the explanation Alito gave the New York Times, agreeing that his wife had probably had cause to fly in response to harassing comments from neighbors and he had nothing to do with it.

Those who disagree with him have noted that some people who stormed the Capitol carried an inverted American flag. They have demanded he step away from any case tied to that Jan. 6 incident and possibly any case connected to disputes over the 2020 election.

Alito’s flag-flying may have temporarily reversed the polarity usually seen among American vexillophiles — a fancy name for flag lovers — who tend to have conservative views on flying the Stars and Stripes that often carry over into conservatism in general.

In the 1960s, for example, the “America Love it or Leave It” crowd were incensed when protesters sewed small American flags on their jackets, noting that the Flag Code says it should not be worn as clothing.

That criticism seemed to stop when military and law enforcement uniforms began sporting flag patches, and self-styled patriots followed suit. These days one might see the widest variety of Star-Spangled clothing at a Trump rally.

Longtime Spokane residents might recall that a painting of a farmer holding an inverted American flag sparked a brief but vocal controversy in 1989. The painting, titled “The Patriot” by local artist Mel McCuddin, was hanging in Eastern Washington University’s Showalter Hall.

Some EWU workers who didn’t like the imagery began circulating a petition to take it down because of what they deemed were unpatriotic and negative connotations. The local office of the American Legion was so incensed about the display of an inverted flag it sent a resolution to its state and local offices calling for the painting’s removal. A few days after a photo of the painting appeared on the front page of The Spokesman-Review, the letters to the editor column were partially filled with missives criticizing the painting — and the paper for running the picture.

McCuddin was surprised by the fuss. He’d shown “The Patriot” in two exhibitions since painting it in 1985 and never had any complaints.

The painting was trying to convey his feeling that American farmers are in trouble. “From what I read, a lot of them are losing land that generations have lived on,” he said.

To which a Flag Code expert for the local Legion office replied: “The farmers in this area are not in that dire distress and they are not in battle. It’s illegal to fly the flag upside down.”

The painting shouldn’t just be taken down, it should be disposed of like all nonusable flags, she said. By burning it.

At the risk of sounding argumentative, in the late 1980s, farm bankruptcies nationwide were higher than any time since the Great Depression and Eastern Washington farmers weren’t immune.

To their credit, EWU officials did not take the painting down. They had planned to move it as part of a regular rotation of art from the university foundation collection, but decided to keep it in Showalter Hall for the rest of the year to avoid looking like they were “knuckling under.”

The Alito household reportedly stopped flying the inverted flag after a few days, but apparently not because of any knuckling under. They flew the Revolutionary War’s “Appeal to Heaven” flag at their beach home last summer, which may have connections to Christian nationalism but at least does not run afoul of the Flag Code.

Loading...