“Kung Fu Panda 4” lands in the OK-fairly good range, i.e., OK-fairly good enough to entice a few million families to the movies this month. The movie world needs babysitters with easy access to concession stands and the “Kung Fu Panda” sequel presents itself as the current choice.
The question lingers, though: What did the 2008 “Kung Fu Panda” achieve that “Panda 4” manages only here and there and now and then?
A first movie in any animated franchise has the theoretical edge, of course, in presenting the world new characters and new everything. The initial “Kung Fu Panda” banked on plenty of martial arts action, but it took some time setting up the specific comic improbability of an amiable panda such as Po, voiced by Jack Black, ascending to his destiny as the Dragon Warrior, protector of all that is good in his corner of ancient China. The film mixed genuine comic invention with clever variants on live-action martial arts movies a la Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan and so many others.
Eight years have flown, inched along or both, depending on your pandemic experience, since “Panda 3.” In “Panda 4,” screenwriters Jonathan Aibel and Glenn Berger return, working with co-writer Darren Lemke and co-directors Mike Mitchell (“Shrek 4,” “Alvin and the Chipmunks 3”) and Stephanie Stine. Stine makes her feature directorial debut here. Her experience as art director includes “Raya and the Last Dragon” and a “How to Train Your Dragon” sequel, gratifying visual accomplishments both.