<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  November 27 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Barred owl proposal is misguided

By Jennifer McCausland, Center for a Humane Economy, Seattle
Published: June 26, 2024, 6:00am

Kudos to Hilary Franz, Washington’s commissioner of public lands, for speaking out against a federal scheme to kill up to 500,000 barred owls in the forests of the Pacific Northwest. In a letter to U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, Franz explained that this plan is a costly, unworkable and far-fetched strategy to protect threatened spotted owls from interspecies competition in old-growth forests.

The kill-plan has a price tag of nearly a quarter-billion dollars; it will swallow up funds for workable endangered species recovery programs.

Covering a physical geography of perhaps 20 million acres, including 17 national forests, the plan devised by U.S. Fish & Wildlife is a pipe dream. Nothing will stop surviving owls from recolonizing open nesting sites. The government will be on a forest-owl-shooting treadmill that never slows down. As Commissioner Franz notes, “there is no precedent for a successful wildlife-control program of this scale.”

Commissioner Franz notes the barred owl “cull” will be the largest-ever raptor slaughter the world has ever known. Our federal wildlife agency must abandon this ill-conceived scheme.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...