<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  October 17 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Camden: Convention not open-shut case

By Jim Camden
Published: July 17, 2024, 6:01am

Minutes after the June 27 presidential debate ended, television talking heads began speculating about every political pundit’s favorite fever dream: an open national political convention.

An open or “brokered” convention is one in which the results of the nomination vote are unknown at its start, creating uncertainty as to who the party’s presidential candidate will be. Because the nation’s 50 states and various territories have spent the previous six months holding primaries and caucuses to award delegates to various candidates,the result is no more a mystery than a basketball game between Gonzaga University and a high school junior varsity team, with the final score only slightly in doubt.

For as long as many of the nation’s pundits have been alive, and definitely as long as the vast majority have been covering politics, no national political convention has convened without a candidate having enough delegates to secure the nomination.

Pundits still hope against hope for scenarios that would allow them to experience something that was once routine. President Joe Biden seemed to fan the embers of those hopes into a fire near the end of Thursday’s news conference. Responding to a question about whether his pledged convention delegates who are having second thoughts are “free to vote their conscience,” he seemed to suggest a path to an open convention.

Actually, delegates are not free to do whatever they want. At least, not on the first ballot, which since the 1950s has been the only ballot needed to select a nominee.

The Democratic Party process — the national rules set down for how delegates are picked and how they vote — makes that difficult. As Rule 13J says, “Delegates elected to the national convention pledged to a presidential candidate shall in all good conscience reflect the sentiments of those who elected them.”

The more important clause in the rule seems to be “reflect the sentiments of those who elect them.” Absent another primary, how might a delegate from Washington or any of the other 49 states determine those sentiments as being against Biden — and if they are, with whom might those sentiments lie?

Beyond that, some states have laws that require a pledged delegate to vote for that candidate for at least the first ballot. Washington has no such law, but the state Democratic Party requires all delegates to follow national rules.

So as long as Biden remains in the race, it would seem the vast majority of the 3,896 delegates he collected — about 99 percent of those available — would have to vote for him. And he needs only about half of those, or 1,968, to get the nomination.

If Biden were to drop out — rules call for a written notice, but a televised statement might suffice — delegates would be free to vote for someone else, although again presumably someone who reflects the sentiments of those who elected them. Because the primaries weren’t contested, there’s no real second choice that delegates could fall back on.

Biden insisted several times he wasn’t dropping out, although he hinted vaguely at the prospect of stepping away if someone could convince him that Vice President Kamala Harris has a better chance of beating Donald Trump. But there’s no rule allowing him to transfer delegates automatically to Harris.

While an open convention might be the dream of many pundits, it could be the worst nightmare for party officials. The last time a sitting president stepped away from his re-election race and none of his possible replacements arrived at the Democratic National Convention with a majority of pledged delegates collected in primaries or caucuses was an inauspicious model.

That was the 1968 convention in Chicago, known more for riots in the streets outside than speeches and pageantry inside the hall. The person nominated at the convention, Vice President Hubert Humphrey, lost. The convention rules were changed to prevent a repeat by requiring more pledged delegates tied to primary or caucus results and less back-room dealings by party bosses.

Loading...