<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday,  September 2 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Climate act has benefits

By Mary Slowik Siciliano, Vancouver
Published: July 12, 2024, 6:00am

Thank you for John Stang’s article on the Climate Commitment Act (“WA ballot initiative would cut $848.6M of environmental programs,” Crosscut, July 8). The act is a major way the state is addressing climate change.

His article makes clear the Climate Commitment Act is not a tax. Its funding rests on those companies that heavily pollute the environment. That it has raised $848.6 million by allowing them to buy “carbon credits” indicates how much pollution these industries are actually generating. It seems to me like a staggering amount.

Stang’s article also makes clear that the price at the gas pump is not tied to the act.

Initiative 2117 asks us to make an all-or-nothing choice about how we address climate change. Stang’s article gives important information on how to make that choice wisely.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...