<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  October 6 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Westneat: Aging a fact, not a scandal

But Democrats need to acknowledge Biden’s limits, weaknesses

By Danny Westneat
Published: July 8, 2024, 6:01am

‘It’s the nouns that go first.”

I’ve been talking with people lately about aging, for obvious reasons. We have been plunged into a national debate about it. About cognitive decline. About good days and bad days. About an uncomfortable question everyone faces at some point on the shuffle along the mortal coil: How old is too old?

The quote above comes from Seattle pollster Stuart Elway, age 75. Based on his polling, he predicted the national anxiety about the fitness of President Joe Biden, age 81, in a column eight months ago.

“This is a blue state, and even blue voters are saying they’re feeling uncomfortable” about Biden’s age, Elway told me last November. His poll of Washington voters found that 70 percent felt Biden, or both he and Donald Trump, were too old to run. It was the sole issue that had some bipartisan consensus. “I think what it means for next year is that every time Biden is on camera, or on the stage,” he said, “every Democrat in the country is going to be holding their breath.”

Nailed that one, unfortunately.

“I bet half of them passed out,” he joked when I caught up with him to ask about the June 27 debate. “If that sentiment was widely shared in a state as blue as ours, it was going to be everywhere.”

Elway said watching Biden was painful in part because it was so familiar. Elway noted he’s been experiencing for himself how aging can derail the neural processor.

“I’ll be lying in bed, and the marble circles around and finally drops in the hole,” he said. “Aha! There’s that name I was trying to remember.”

For me, watching Biden reminded me a bit of my father. My dad just turned 95. He talks frequently about how he finds it hard at times to keep pace with conversations, such as when his three sons are heatedly debating. (OK, arguing.)

He was a college professor. He’ll form an insightful thought that he wants to share, but by the time the thought moves to his tongue, it feels too late, he told me. He’s still healthy enough to live alone. But his synapse speed has slowed.

This ebbing is as natural a part of the life process as learning how to walk, according to the Seattle Longitudinal Study, a research project on aging that’s been going since 1956 at the University of Washington. Looking at the same people over decades, that study found that baseline cognitive functioning tends to improve for most people from young adulthood to midlife, but then declines slightly starting in the 60s. The first signs really are those missing nouns. Then it typically progresses downward into the 80s and beyond.

Aging is not a disease, the study reminds, and it manifests differently in everyone. But it’s also universal and undefeated.

I ran into the complexity of aging and politics as a political reporter back in the 1990s. I was doing a lifestyle feature on a congressman, Rep. Jack Metcalf of Whidbey Island, when I noticed in interviews that he would repeat himself without realizing it. Or he’d have to be prodded about what we’d been talking about.

Metcalf had already announced he was retiring at the end of his term. Still, I was faced with a choice. I could allow him to finish out his term without comment. Or I could write the news, which was that a congressman was faltering and no longer up to the job.

I’m conflicted about it to this day, but I chose the former. He was a public official, so people had an interest in knowing. But he hadn’t done anything wrong. Plus he also had already done the hardest part behind the scenes. He had faced the existential question — how old is too old? — and answered it for himself.

After he was out of office, Metcalf said he had Alzheimer’s. He died a few years after that. I’ve always appreciated what his family wrote in his obituary: “His last years were marked by a rapid decline due to Alzheimer’s disease, and his death is both a loss and a blessing for his family and friends.” A loss and a blessing. That’s the most incomprehensible thing about growing old — that it can be both.

I’ve already opined that I think both parties need to get honest with themselves and drop their nominees — Trump because he’s corrupt, and Biden because he’s infirm. The official GOP denial of reality about Trump is a travesty; the question now is whether Democrats join them in a parallel blinkered state.

I say that even though one flaw is far more egregious than the other. There’s no scandal, after all, about time’s toll. It only becomes one if you refuse to acknowledge it.

Loading...