WASHINGTON — Here’s a look at how area members of Congress voted over the week ending July 3.
Congress is scheduled to be in session next week.
House
ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION: The House has passed an amendment sponsored by Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 8774), that would bar funding for implementation of most of an executive order issued by President Joe Biden that directed various federal government agencies to work with private groups on voter registration and elections. Tenney called the order “a blatant attempt to transform the federal government into a partisan, get-out-the-vote machine for Democrats.” An amendment opponent, Rep. Betty McCollum, D-Minn., said the order was only “making sure that every American has the opportunity and the acknowledgment of when and how to vote.” The vote, on June 28, was 201 yeas to 187 nays.
NAYS:
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-3rd
CLIMATE CHANGE AND CONTRACTORS: The House has passed an amendment sponsored by Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 8774). The amendment would bar funding for implementation of a multi-agency greenhouse gas emissions regulation requiring large contractors with the federal government to disclose their emissions, as well as comply with the Paris Climate Accords. Tenney said the rule would mean using a partisan, London-based company, Science Based Targets Initiative, to audit the emissions disclosures, with resulting national security concerns. An amendment opponent, Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, said it was “grounded in the incorrect assumption that a strong defense industrial base is fundamentally incompatible with cleaner, sustainable energy and climate resiliency.” The vote, on June 28, was 211 yeas to 199 nays.
YEAS:
Perez
CLUSTER MUNITIONS: The House has rejected an amendment sponsored by Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 8774), that would have barred funding for the use or sale of cluster munitions. Titus said the broad, indiscriminate dispersion of cluster bombs resulted in long-term hazards to civilians over large areas due to their lengthy presence, and the difficulty of safely removing the bombs. An amendment opponent, Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif., said the funding ban “would tie our hands in future conflicts, prohibiting the option to use these munitions in contingencies where the only other option are larger munitions that cause even more casualties.” The vote, on June 28, was 129 yeas to 284 nays.