<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 29 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Question utility’s budget

By Paul Rollins, Vancouver
Published: January 23, 2024, 6:00am

A sidebar to a recent article about Clark Public Utilities’ consideration of a rate increase made the incorrect statement, “The utility uses zero-based budgeting, meaning expenses and income must bring its ledger to zero by the end of the fiscal year.”

First, this implies that Clark Public Utilities’ income always exactly equals its expenses, which is false. Read the financial statements. Second, in true zero-based budgeting, every budget account for the period starts at zero. From there, the account’s budget is built by justifying every expense that is added. This contrasts with common budgeting practice of starting with last-period’s number and adding some arbitrary amount, like 10 percent.  Zero-based budgeting is the exception rather than the rule for business, government, etc. The process is more sophisticated, more time-consuming, and requires a higher level of management skill and critical analysis than the common process.

I hope Clark Public Utilities does use real zero-based budgeting, but won’t be surprised if it doesn’t. If Clark Public Utilities isn’t using zero-based budgeting, I hope it will start. It could keep their expenses, and rates, down.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...