<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 29 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Dictionary defines Indigenous

By Terrence Dunn, Vancouver
Published: January 17, 2024, 6:00am

We all know of, and many have used, the Oxford English Dictionary and the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Now there is a new dictionary, the Ault Dictionary (“There are no Indigenous peoples,” Our Readers’ Views, Jan. 13). In the OED and Merriam-Webster, Indigenous people are defined as the original inhabitants of a territory. This is common and correct usage. In the Ault Dictionary however, Indigenous people are defined as the most recent group to violently steal a territory from the original inhabitants.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...