<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  November 14 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Snake dams do not prevent flooding

By Marjorie Millner, Vancouver
Published: January 4, 2024, 6:00am

A recent letter described the four lower Snake River dams as offering a line of defense against flooding (“Preserve lower Snake dams,” Our Readers’ Views, Dec. 30). In fact, they do not. Congress did not authorize flood control as a purpose and the dams are “run of the river” dams, meaning they were not built to store water.

In fact, due to sediment buildup, Lower Granite Dam actually creates a flood risk to Lewiston, Idaho, and Clarkston. The next flood will put downtown Lewiston and Clarkston under six feet of water or more, because of the Lower Granite Dam.

The federal government recently entered into a plan to replace the dams’ services and breach the four lower Snake River dams. This was long overdue, but at last it is agreed that the dams must go, and soon. It is time for all to accept this and stop wasting energy and time trying to retain the illegal, old, polluting, deadly dams, and instead put that energy into replacing the dams’ services.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...