<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  September 14 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Other Papers Say: Rent control does the opposite

By The following editorial originally appeared in the Las Vegas Review-Journal
Published: August 31, 2024, 6:01am

The evidence against rent control is vast and continues to pile high. The latest example comes from Argentina.

In 2020, Argentina faced rapidly rising rental costs, just as many parts of the United States — including Southwest Washington — are currently experiencing. The South American country implemented rent control.

The government required that contracts run for at least three years. Officials capped annual rent increases at the weighted average of wage growth and inflation. They limited how much landlords could require in deposits and required rents to be paid in pesos. Landlords had been trying to protect themselves from inflation — which reached an annual rate of more than 200 percent — by demanding rent in a foreign currency such as the U.S. dollar.

Many American progressives want similar government interventions in the housing market here.

The appeal of rent control is obvious when rents are soaring. Current renters receive a benefit when the government distorts the market to their advantage.

But the downside of rent control is just as obvious if you ask a simple question: What happens next?

The supply of rental homes decreases. Landlords are less likely to rent out properties with an artificial cap on their returns. Investors build fewer homes and apartment complexes. Existing units become homes or condos for sale. Landlords spend less on maintenance and upkeep, because they lack a financial incentive to make improvements and lack the funding for those improvements. The renters won’t leave, because they’re paying below-market rates. Run-down apartments and homes cause nearby property values to decrease.

When the supply of rental homes drops, prices increase. Thus, rent control ends up doing the opposite of what it promised.

That’s just what happened in Argentina. After the government imposed rent control, 45 percent of landlords opted to sell their properties. Others listed them on short-term rental sites. In Buenos Aires, the number of Airbnb properties nearly tripled from 2019 to 2023.

Unsurprisingly, rents soared. In Buenos Aires, the average cost for a two-bedroom apartment went from 18,000 pesos a month in 2019 to more than 330,000 pesos in January. If rent had merely kept up with inflation, it would have been 210,000 pesos.

Last November, Javier Milei was elected Argentina’s president. He’s a brilliant defender of economic liberty. He has aggressively put free-market ideas into action. That included scrapping rent control.

As a result, rental supply in Buenos Aires has nearly doubled. In March, The Telegraph reported that rents had fallen by 20 percent.

The free market works. Rent control doesn’t.

Loading...