<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  November 27 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Vancouver Lake plan is misguided

By Thom McConathy, VANCOUVER
Published: August 2, 2024, 6:00am

The treatment of Vancouver Lake with expensive algicides is a waste of public resources as it treats the symptoms without correcting the disease — namely an excess of available nutrients. After the alga is treated, it will sink to the bottom for a time and as bacteria attacks it will then float to the surface stinking of rot and killing fish by depriving them of oxygen. Rotting fish and vegetation will not make the swimming beach more attractive.

Long-term solutions must include reducing the nutrients entering the lake from the Salmon Creek and the Burnt Bridge Creek drainages. The only entity gaining from this application is the company paid.

Good science has been done by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the nature and sources of nutrient loading of this lake. This is not a responsible or long-term solution.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...