<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  November 28 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Ridgefield bonds are too much

By Craig T. Lynch, Ridgefield
Published: April 13, 2024, 6:00am

A recent editorial urged readers to approve Ridgefield school bonds (In Our View, April 6) to mitigate problems of overcrowding resulting from rapid development. Probably a good idea, but there is more to the story. The fact was mentioned that our superintendent was recently separated (with no public justification) with a $318,000 buyout. What was not said is that the district did the same thing with a previous superintendent, for another couple hundred thousand dollars, plus some benefits.

Proponents stress that overcrowding is the driving force and classrooms are needed. However, the bonds contain many items like routine building repairs, a wrestling room, locker rooms, track resurfacing, playgrounds and an upgraded band room. Can a Chinese ballet studio be next?

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...