<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  November 28 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Plan ahead for electricity needs

By Richard MacMinn, Camas
Published: April 4, 2024, 6:00am

I agree with the ideas expressed by Gordon Matthews (“Plan ahead for power generation,” Our Readers’ Views, March 30). Clark Public Utilities seems to have fallen behind in diversifying the sources of energy generation that it uses. There is or was a solar program, but the description I recall was so cryptic that it was not possible to count the cost.

In addition to diversifying sources of energy, there are questions about risk management that should be addressed. The current rate increase and the previous losses of $20 million in 2023 and $11 million in 2021 suggest that adequate risk management practices are not being used. Buying electricity forward would allow the price to be fixed and so reduce the dependence on the volatile spot price. Climate change increases the risk of the spot market and makes risk management even more important.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...