<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday,  November 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Striner: Republicans need Eisenhower’s way

By Richard Striner
Published: September 5, 2023, 6:01am

During his first term as president, Dwight Eisenhower turned to his press secretary, Jim Hagerty, and said, “If the right wing wants a fight, they’re going to get it. If they want to leave the Republican Party and form a third party, that’s their business, but before I end up, either this Republican Party will reflect progressivism, or I won’t be there with them anymore.”

Eisenhower wrote in his diary that he might even have to form a third party himself and dedicate it to “the Middle Way” — his term for the political centrism that he favored. This could be a potent theme for today’s Republican Party after next year.

Third parties in American history have come and gone. Our current two-party system was born when another system failed. The Republican Party began in 1854 when renegades from other parties — the Democrats and Whigs — united. A pithy term had been making the rounds among Democrats who decided their party was hopeless: They were called “barn burners.” They were ready to burn down the barn because the party problems they saw were deemed too pervasive to fix.

Something similar may start among Republican moderates by 2025 if they believe their party is hopeless: They may contemplate starting over. And Ike would probably urge them to do it.

In the 1950s, Ike didn’t need to. He found a way to create a brand of politics so unifying that Democrats and Republicans came to love him. He succeeded spectacularly in uniting a divided nation.

How did he do it? As president, Eisenhower created visionary programs to keep the American people prosperous, safe and free for decades: the Interstate Highway System, for example, and space-based surveillance. The latter program was, of course, top secret.

With civil rights, his method was incremental, but firm, to keep the nation calm. Eisenhower nominated Earl Warren to be chief justice of the Supreme Court knowing that he supported integration. He was not afraid to enforce the rule of law when he ordered the 101st Airborne Division into Little Rock, Ark., to ensure the safety of the “Little Rock Nine” and uphold the rulings of the Supreme Court.

Later on, scholars would call him the “hidden hand” president. Today’s MAGA Republicans would probably view him as an incarnation of the “deep state.”

For the past few years, Republican moderates have writhed as the far-right “base” maintains its hold in Republican primaries. Trumpism significantly reduced Republican electoral gains in the 2022 midterms, and presidential candidate Chris Christie warns that an electoral catastrophe for Republicans might occur in 2024. If a Democratic landslide does occur, constructive Republicans will have a “time for choosing.”

Currently, their party is on the way to nominating for the presidency an individual charged with numerous felonies. The prospect of such a Republican presidential candidacy would have been unthinkable 10 years ago. It is now the new normal.

Even if Trump is convicted of crimes, Republicans may still nominate him. The MAGA base is unappeasable: Followers’ lust to divide our society for the fun of it and make rational governance impossible shows no signs of diminishing.

Is it time for constructive, policy-focused Republicans who don’t view their office as a performative platform to quit the party and do something drastically different? Not yet. Many commentators have warned that one or more third-party candidacies in 2024 could play into Trump’s hands.

But perhaps it will be time, in the event of a Republican debacle, to give the new barn burners their day. There may be scores of Republican and Democratic moderates who would be interested in working together in a new fusion party, a catalytic party that would usher in a different party system.

A three-party system, at least for a while, might do the nation good in these very strange times. Creating a new dynamic to give pragmatists a basis for power brokerage by mobilizing huge coalitions of people who are tired of a divisive, negative approach to politics might be worth trying after 2024.

Is there any doubt about what Ike would say?

Richard Striner is the author of a new biography about Dwight Eisenhower, “Ike in Love and War: How Dwight D. Eisenhower Sacrificed Himself to Keep the Peace.” He wrote this for the Chicago Tribune.

Loading...