The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
There are surprising parallels between presidential candidates
By Carl P. Leubsdorf
Published: March 12, 2023, 6:01am
Share:
On a February night in 1975, as the chief political writer of The Associated Press, I attended the second annual meeting of a new conservative organization for a speech that was to have a historic long-term impact.
The organization was the Conservative Political Action Conference, and the speaker was recently retired California Gov. Ronald Reagan, giving his prescription for a Republican Party that was floundering in the aftermath of President Richard Nixon’s Watergate-precipitated resignation six months earlier.
“Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which makes it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?” Reagan asked.
It proved not only the clarion call for Reagan’s nearly successful 1976 primary challenge to Nixon’s unelected successor, Gerald Ford, but for Reagan’s successful 1980 presidential bid. CPAC supporters were in the vanguard, as he transformed the GOP into a more aggressive challenger of the political status quo.
To be sure, Reagan governed as much in “pale pastels” as in “bold colors.” But his rhetoric never lost its boldness from the day he declared that “Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.”
Now, fast-forward 48 years to another CPAC meeting last weekend, and the speaker who represents this generation’s challenge to the political status quo, former President Donald Trump. If Reagan was CPAC’s hero of the 1970s and 1980s, Trump represents its current incarnation.
To be sure, Trump lacks Reagan’s often genial manner, his graciousness and his willingness to compromise. His sense of “bold colors” makes Reagan’s seem like “pale pastels,” as Saturday’s typically bombastic, error-laden, misleading diatribe showed. But just as Reagan proved a more effective challenger to the political establishment than his generation’s other Republicans, Trump poses a far greater threat to the Washington order than his potential 2024 rivals.
He vows dramatic changes in Washington’s “corrupt establishment” if he can match President Grover Cleveland’s feat and regain the presidency after losing it.
Last weekend, he said he’d tackle it “stronger, faster and better,” conceding that he knew little about Washington when he first became president because “I was from New York” and previously had made only brief visits to the capital.
“Now, I am experienced, and I know the people of Washington,” Trump said, making clear that, if he returned, he’ll be surrounded by people committed to his goals, rather than the cross-section of Republicans who staffed his prior administration.
“I will totally obliterate the deep state,” he vowed. “I will fire the unelected bureaucrats and shadow forces who have weaponized our justice system like it has never been weaponized before.”
The fact that Trump again dominated CPAC’s annual straw poll with 62 percent means only that the organization that once housed various shades of conservatives has become a one-candidate army, dedicated to returning Trump to power.
More significant is the fact, noted in last weekend’s New York Times, that Trump’s advisers are working hard to create the machinery that will maximize their delegate totals during next year’s primaries.
First, the structure of Republican primaries makes it possible for a candidate to get a minority of the vote but a majority of the delegates, both statewide and in districts.
Second, in many states, the people who become convention delegates are not directly elected in the primaries but are chosen in separate party processes. Though many states require them to vote according to the primary results, they are generally free to follow their consciences.
Trump’s operatives, The Times said, are working hard at the state level to maximize their strength, bolstered by the fact that they start out with a base of committed supporters in every state and every precinct.
It is easy to watch Trump and dismiss much of what he is saying as the ravings of a man disconnected from reality. Party leaders are prone to minimize his chances. That was also true with the establishment when Reagan initially challenged Ford.
But beneath the bombast and the rhetoric, there is — as with Reagan — a solid layer of supporters who will likely keep Trump in the GOP race until the end and would make him a potent, though underdog general election candidate if nominated.
