The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
This is what happens in academia when the donors are calling the shots. Heads roll, all right. Big-time. The dean of the faculty supervising arts and sciences went first. Then came the resignation letter from the president of the university. The system falls right apart.
Watch it happen in real time at Texas A&M. See them score points at the expense of the university.
Conservative politics took over the appointments process for the new director of the journalism school. Two weeks ago, they were celebrating. The choice of the faculty and the university was a distinguished alum and professor at the University of Texas who worked at The New York Times more than a decade ago: Kathleen McElroy.
At first, her appointment, and her reputation as a leader of diversity and inclusion, was widely praised. But then the political pushback began, among alumni and in a conservative publication.
She told the press: “I said, ‘What’s wrong?’ ” McElroy recalled of her conversation with the dean, Jose Luis Bermudez. “He said, ‘You’re a Black woman who was at The New York Times and, to these folks, that’s like working for Pravda.’ ” Like working for Pravda, indeed.
The promise of a five-year contract turned into a one-year deal, which she ultimately declined. The faculty senate has commissioned a fact-finding report to determine what happened and how it was that the offers were suddenly changed. The president reportedly expressed both confusion and embarrassment at how things were handled, but the bottom line is that political pressure was exerted, the appointment process was corrupted and the result was the integrity of the university has been badly damaged. It was bad enough that McElroy declined the offer and M. Katherine Banks, the university president, submitted a letter of retirement.
Who is going to want that job next? Here you had a phenomenal candidate — a dedicated and talented Texas A&M alumna, no less — who had run the program at Texas, ready to build a program, and you turn her away to score cheap political points because you don’t like an opinion piece she wrote supporting diversity and inclusion or the fact that she worked at a newspaper that your graduates would love to work for.
Does being on the Board of Regents give an ideological veto over tenure, as the background in this case suggests? How far does politics reach in limiting academic freedom of tenure-less faculty?
That this is the way conservative politics is infecting education in Texas tells you just how much trouble education is in. And of course, it’s not just Texas; it’s not just journalism schools; it’s whoever they choose to target next.
This was, relatively speaking, easy. A veritable surgical strike that did enormous harm to an important institution. At the expense of a better, more exciting, better connected — and more diverse and inclusive — journalism school than there will be next year. The university, the college, and the journalism school are all left without leaders.
The students who would have been part of an exciting new program won’t be. All so some alumni fat cats can sit back and feel good about killing a diverse program that never existed.
Morning Briefing Newsletter
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.
