<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 29 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Colorado court acted prematurely

By Greg Ikehara-Martin, Vancouver
Published: December 27, 2023, 6:00am

The Columbian is surely correct that the best way to keep Donald Trump from returning to the White House is to defeat him next November (“Colorado ruling on Trump symbolic and troubling,” In Our View, Dec. 21).

I missed clarity on two other points. First, the Colorado Supreme Court ruling is “troubling” because it is premature. The court could have been helpful had it said, “Donald Trump is not above the law, but he is entitled to due process of law. He is innocent until proven guilty. Until a separate trial finds him guilty of insurrection, the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, section 3, is not germane.”

Secondly, we need to rebuild trust, among all citizens, and especially for public institutions. Donald Trump’s supporters do not trust the impartiality of our courts, and the existence of such suspicion is a dire threat to our democracy. The court should have followed the rubric, “First, do no harm.” Its ruling may, sadly, serve to validate Trump supporters’ worst fears about our courts.

The constant quandary for those of us who oppose authoritarianism is how to block the path to power of those who would break rules and norms without breaking them ourselves. The times call for all citizens — and courts — to behave in a conspicuously trustworthy manner.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...