<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Tuesday,  November 5 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Estrich: The fall of ‘America’s Mayor’

By Susan Estrich
Published: December 23, 2023, 6:01am

A federal jury last week returned a verdict awarding plaintiffs Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, $148.17 million in damages in their defamation trial against Rudy Giuliani arising out of his claims that the two election workers committed fraud during the 2020 election in Georgia. The judgment will bankrupt Giuliani, and the worst is yet to come when he faces criminal charges in Georgia next year for racketeering in connection with his efforts to overturn that election.

How did the man who was once America’s most famous prosecutor — using the same racketeering theories that are now being used against him — end up in the defense box?

Bad lawyering is certainly part of the reason. In the defamation trial, the jury’s role was limited to determining how much he would pay. Giuliani had already conceded that he lied about the two women’s activities. The stipulation was supposedly intended to “avoid unnecessary expenses in litigating what he believes to be unnecessary disputes.” Giuliani is drowning in legal fees that he can’t afford to pay without help from former President Donald Trump, who he can’t afford to desert, like some of Trump’s other lawyers have done in the Georgia case.

If that were not enough to seal his fate, he also refused to hand over evidence in discovery, leading the judge to sanction him. “The bottom line is that Giuliani has refused to comply with his discovery obligations,” the judge wrote last summer. “Just as taking shortcuts to win an election carries risks — even potential criminal liability — bypassing the discovery process carries serious sanctions, no matter what reservations a noncompliant party may try artificially to preserve for appeal.”

In a four-day trial, the plaintiffs recalled how they were plagued with threats after Giuliani repeatedly attacked them. A brief, heavily edited clip of security video was circulated online in which Giuliani claimed the women were “passing around USB ports like they were vials of heroin or cocaine.” In fact, according to the House Jan. 6 committee’s report, they were passing a ginger mint.

After saying earlier that he would take the stand and make “definitively clear” that what he said about the two women “was true” — notwithstanding his stipulation to the contrary —Giuliani chose not to testify.

The real question is why Giuliani put himself in the most vulnerable position of any of Trump’s lawyers, taking the lead in the twisted and ill-thought-out effort to reverse the election. Did he really believe his own lies? Or did a combination of ego and greed lead him to step into the limelight that he has craved throughout his career?

He’s still in the limelight, but as a broken man with no obvious way out of his problems and no one to blame but himself. The two women from Georgia will join a growing list of creditors who he owes. If attention was what he craved, he got it, and now he is facing the consequences. The chickens are coming home to roost.

Loading...