<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  September 5 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Editorials

In Our View: Take high temperatures, climate change seriously

The Columbian
Published: July 26, 2022, 6:03am

Hot enough for you?

That old conversation starter has taken on new meaning in recent years, with high temperatures providing constant reminders of the effects of climate change. So do extreme cold, atmospheric rivers of rain and severe drought.

This week, however, we are experiencing hot weather, with an excessive heat warning being issued Monday by the National Weather Service and expected to last until Thursday evening. “The hottest temperatures are expected Tuesday and Wednesday. Considerable uncertainty surrounds temperatures on Thursday. Overnight lows spanning 65 to 70 in the Portland/Vancouver Metro will provide little relief for those without air conditioning,” says a warning from the weather service’s Portland office.

That increases the chances of heat-related illnesses for people working outdoors or engaged in outdoor activities. Clark County Public Health advises residents to drink plenty of fluids, avoid strenuous activity outdoors, and not leave children or pets in parked cars. Several cooling centers are provided throughout Clark County, including at regional libraries and community centers.

Temperatures are not expected to approach the record-breaking heat of last summer, when Vancouver reached 115 degrees on the hottest day in the city’s recorded history. But they represent a cycle that is increasingly evident — and increasingly costly — throughout the nation.

A decade ago, naysayers insisted that climate change was a “hoax.” Donald Trump said, “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing noncompetitive.” Despite this absurd proclamation, he was elected president.

These days, with the reality of climate change impossible to ignore, critics claim that we cannot afford proposed measures to slow global warming. The truth is that we cannot afford to ignore them.

The Office of Management and Budget this year estimated that floods, drought, wildfires and hurricanes made worse by climate change could cost the federal budget about $2 trillion a year by the end of the century. The report also warned that the federal government could spend an additional $25 billion to $128 billion a year on coastal disaster relief, flood insurance, crop insurance, health insurance, wildfire suppression and flooding at federal facilities.

That does not include spending by states to repair damage from climate-related disasters, nor does it include pocketbook expenses from residents.

Most important, it does not account for global food shortages, disease and migration that will result from continuing climate change. As New York Times Magazine asked in 2020: “Today, 1 percent of the world is a barely livable hot zone. By 2070, that portion could go up to 19 percent. Billions of people call this land home. Where will they go?”

The answer is obvious: They will seek to relocate to more welcoming climates. Americans concerned about illegal immigration should recognize the threat posed by severe climate change and support measures to slow it. Those measures focus on limiting the emission of greenhouse gases, mostly from the burning of fossil fuels, which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere.

None of that is represented by a couple days of hot weather in Clark County. But the temperatures expected this week are reflective of a severe global problem that demands attention.

The truth is that, yes, it is hot enough for us. We should elect leaders who take the threat seriously.

Loading...