<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  November 28 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Other Papers Say: Russian threat to G-7 and NATO is real

By The following editorial originally appeared in the (Minneapolis) Star Tribune:
Published: July 4, 2022, 6:01am

By definition, meetings of global leaders are important even if they’re not always consequential.

Last month’s G-7 and NATO summits were substantive, particularly in producing a more clear-eyed view of Russia. Whether the decisions and declarations made are enough to turn the tide for Ukraine in its existential fight against Russia’s invasion remains to be seen. Still, the commitment of enduring support was critical.

At the G-7 summit in Germany, leaders from the seven largest industrial democracies (the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Canada) agreed to continue providing aid to Ukraine.

“We are committed to helping Ukraine to uphold its sovereignty and territorial integrity, to defend itself, and to choose its own future,” the leaders said in a statement. “It is up to Ukraine to decide on a future peace settlement, free from external pressure or influence. We will continue to coordinate efforts to meet Ukraine’s urgent requirements for military and defense equipment.”

One of those necessary requests was an advanced missile defense system, which the Biden administration indicated it would supply as part of recently passed legislation authorizing another $40 billion to aid Ukraine.

The need was already apparent but amplified by Russia hitting the capital Kyiv and a crowded shopping mall in Kremenchuk with missile strikes. The mall “had no strategic value,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on social media. “Only the attempt of people to live a normal life, which so angers the occupiers.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin “doesn’t care where his army is attacking sites in Ukraine; they don’t distinguish between military and civilian sites,” said Melinda Haring, deputy director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center.

The only way to reduce the grim death toll is to stiffen Ukraine’s resistance with more capabilities. Concrete conclusions could be found at the subsequent NATO summit in Spain. Turkey lifted its objections to Sweden and Finland joining NATO, resulting in an alliance expansion that is the opposite of one of Putin’s purported goals of his full-scale invasion in February.

President Joe Biden also announced an increased troop presence in Europe and said for the first time the U.S. would have a permanent presence in Poland. And NATO leaders released a new “Strategic Concept” that, among other updates, moves Russia from a potential partner to the “most significant and direct threat” the alliance faces.

With the U.S. commitment to the missile defense system, Biden sent the proper signal, but he must accelerate sending other desperately needed materiel to Ukraine. Although NATO’s newfound sense of mission will probably deter Putin from expanding his aggression, Ukraine is a critical test that the West must not fail.

Loading...