The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
Parties should unite around police chiefs’ proposals to combat gun violence
By Martin Schram
Published: December 5, 2022, 6:03am
Share:
Beneath the still-gleaming white dome, the Capitol’s new generation of leaders are jockeying for position, staking their turf, marking their hydrants, and swapping last-minute promises for next year’s power.
Today we will mainly be speaking to just one category of our promising new leaders: The ones who want you to know how they will lead America’s party of law-and-order.
Week after week, as our prospective congressional leaders quietly worked behind the scenes to climb the leadership ladder, our news was dominated by horrific news of mass shootings — at a school, or a mall, or a club. And those who hoped to see a solution by watching Congress in action saw only congressional inaction. Yet again.
For years, we have watched in frustration as the leaders of the party of law-and-order failed to respond to the 911 calls from the police chiefs who just want Congress to help them keep us safe. The International Association of Chiefs of Police website carries five pages of firearms policy proposals “to safeguard the public and those who put their lives on the line each day to ensure the safety and well-being of communities.”
The nation’s police chiefs, who command the front lines in the battle for law-and-order, have proposed 13 “commonsense polices that would assist in reducing gun violence, while upholding the Second Amendment” to the United States Constitution, which guarantees Americans’ right to possess firearms.
The police chiefs urged a renewal of the ban on the U.S. manufacturing of semi-automatic assault weapons, plus a halt to the production of ammunition magazines (except for military and police use) that carry more than 10 rounds of ammunition. In 1994, Congress enacted an assault weapons ban that was led, in large part, by Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del. But in 2004, the ban was allowed to expire under President George W. Bush. Biden has said he wants to re-impose the ban.
“While the ban was in place, it was remarkably effective in reducing the number of crimes involving assault weapons,” the police chiefs’ website states. “In the period of the ban, (1994-2004) the proportion of assault weapons traced to crimes fell by a dramatic 66 percent. Semi-automatic assault weapons are routinely the weapons of choice for gang members and drug dealers. They are regularly encountered in drug busts and are all too often used against police officers. … The criminal use of semiautomatic assault weapons pose a grave risk to our officers and the communities they are sworn to protect.”
The police chiefs also propose: a prohibition on mail-order sales of bulletproof vests and body armor, bans on the sales of armor-piercing ammunition and tracer ammunition, a five-day waiting period for handgun purchases, a closing of the gun show loophole so that the background checks and waiting periods that apply to gun stores will also apply to gun shows.
You may have noticed that, while discussing the “party of law-and-order,” we have not mentioned the names of either of America’s major political parties. Until now. During the era of Vietnam War protests, Richard Nixon worked to convince the nation that Republicans deserved the designation. (He had help: As police efforts to clear street protests turned violent, protesters famously called police “pigs.”) Ronald Reagan worked to solidify the GOP claim. (And protests of deadly police abuses spawned chants of “Defund the police!”)
But most recently, America’s police chiefs saw that their reforms were largely championed by Democrats — and opposed by many Republicans, who followed the views and campaign money of the gun-makers and the National Rifle Association. But be wary of glib generalities.
After a 1989 school shooting in Stockton, Calif., Reagan, an ex-president for just 17 days, said: “I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting and so forth, or for home defense. But I do believe that an AK-47 … is not a sporting weapon or needed for defense of a home.” And in 1994, Reagan joined two fellow ex-presidents, Republican Gerald Ford and Democrat Jimmy Carter, in signing a letter supporting a ban on domestic manufacture of “assault weapons.”
It is time for our new congressional leaders to make history by bringing a new era of unity to our tired old partisan gun politics. Be it resolved: The “Party of Law-and-Order” is now officially bipartisan. Better yet, above politics. Let the coming out party begin.
