Ambrose: Can Liz Cheney still win in the long run?

What she calls for is something constitutionally hardy from sea to shining sea.

It would be helpful if she also talked more about the even worse Democrats abandoning any sense of this game having rules. She herself has participated in their shenanigans and is doing so at the moment, although I must say this: She is to me the most inspiring voice of the House’s Jan. 6 committee that has practiced righteous anger along with eloquence in its assault on Trump’s despicable role in the deadly Capitol riot.

The problem is that there is next to no challenge to varied suppositions and arguments and that the proceedings therefore fall short of due process.

Cheney has done something like this before, as in voting with the Democrats in essentially a one-day hearing on Trump impeachment proceedings for his role in Jan. 6 when such procedures can take weeks and months to produce evidence not at hand this time out.

The following Senate trial on Trump inciting the riot was aimed at him as a private citizen when the Constitution clearly states that these eviction procedures are about eviction, about removing an official from office, not just keeping him or her from running again.

Another requirement is that the chief justice of the Supreme Court be in charge; Justice John Roberts said no, clearly not approving of such a farcical embarrassment.

Well, Cheney still endorsed the trial and voted to evict this person who was already thrown out of the White House by voters in what he obsessively and destructively called a fraudulent election when it wasn’t.

Nevertheless, this daughter of a mother who wrote 17 books and was head of the National Endowment for the Humanities and a father who was vice president and secretary of defense has demonstrated her own competence in a number of positions.

To name two, she was a successful international attorney and served well in the State Department, trying in one undertaking to improve education and economics in the Middle East. First elected to the House in 2016, she climbed to an important leadership post as she fought for conservative causes.

She had just a few problems with Trump early on, but, with the passage of time, grew more and more fretful even as she knew she could thereby alienate herself from fellow Republicans. She as much as sacrificed her reelection this year to keep fighting the good fight.

While some have said it was egotistical of her to compare herself to Lincoln, one of the functions of greatness is to inspire greatness in others. Maybe she won’t be elected president, as she concedes, but she will still do all she can for the crucial resurrection of the Republican Party and revivification of the federal government.

She seems to believe she and others will somehow win, and I must personally say that, for all my criticisms, I have listened to her talk in the Jan. 6 sessions and have come to believe there is really something special there.

I also think that it is time for Trump to disappear from politics as long as it happens with respect for law and principles.