<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 15 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Other Papers Say: Make DOE accountable to Hanford

By The Seattle Times
Published: September 26, 2021, 6:01am

The following editorial originally appeared in The Seattle Times:

The U.S. Department of Justice should drop its legal challenge to a state law that helps Hanford workers receive timely and needed medical benefits for on-the-job injuries.

Going even further, the Biden administration should set a new course for the Department of Energy, which manages the former plutonium factory on the banks of the Columbia River.

The Department of Energy is the client in this litigation, and the agency has a long track record of throwing up roadblocks to those injured in some of the most dangerous work imaginable.

“They’re saying workers at Hanford are a commodity and expendable,” said Bertola Bugarin, whose husband, 70-year-old Abe Garza, is critically ill after several exposures to toxic vapors at work.

The case revolves around workers’ compensation claims.

In June, the state Department of Commerce published a survey of more than 1,200 Hanford workers about their possible exposure to toxic vapors.

More than 57 percent of all current and former workers reported coming into contact with poisonous chemicals. More than 32 percent of respondents indicated long-term exposure.

Treating health effects for Hanford workers is all the more complex because illnesses can take years to manifest.

As is standard procedure, injured Hanford workers first file a workers’ compensation claim with their employer, Department of Energy. That’s where the stonewalling begins.

A 2018 Department of Energy Inspector General report determined the agency “does not have effective processes, procedures, and controls over the Workers’ Compensation Program at the Hanford site.”

That same year, state legislators stepped in and made it easier for Hanford workers to seek compensation for illnesses and injuries. The new law was signed by Gov. Jay Inslee in March 2018 and took effect five months later.

In December 2018, Department of Energy sued Washington, seeking to declare the state law unconstitutional. A U.S. District Court ruled in the state’s favor in 2019. Department of Energy appealed and lost the next year in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

On Sept. 8, Department of Energy filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

At a Pasco news conference last week, a visibly angry state Attorney General Bob Ferguson said: “The Biden administration should withdraw their appeal immediately.”

The White House should do more than that.

DOE Secretary Jennifer M. Granholm, former governor of Michigan, took over the agency earlier this year. She should recognize DOE’s terrible history of fighting medical bills and intervene to ensure cooperation with workers.

Resolving workers’ compensation claims at Hanford and other toxic sites around the country is expensive. But it is clearly the right thing to do, and that should be the federal government’s bottom line.

Loading...