Neighbors challenge Clark County on permit for imported materials
By Jack Heffernan, Columbian
county government and small cities reporter
Published: March 8, 2021, 6:01am
Share:
Residents south of Ridgefield are concerned that a massive collection of dirt — enough to fill Seattle’s Lumen Field complex 16-feet high — might be headed their way.
Owners of nearly 82-acres of land on Northwest 179th Street north of Northwest 56th Avenue, in the Sara neighborhood of unincorporated Clark County, filed a grading permit last year with the county. In the application, owners asked for permission to, on just over 37 acres of the land, import 533,000 cubic yards of material from off-site sources and cut 13,000 cubic yards of vegetation, primarily grass.
Over the past few months, dozens of neighbors and some environmental advocates have pushed back. They’ve raised concerns about traffic impacts and safety from the number of truck trips that might be required, road deterioration, noise, farmland degradation and other environmental concerns.
“We’re expecting our quality of life to degrade considerably while this happens,” said Dona Dingethal, who lives across the street from the land. “You do the simple math and it’s a lot of trucks all day, every day.”
The property falls on a rural-10 zoning designation. County code mandates that property owners in such a zone must file for a grading and drainage permit when the activity will include more than 200 yards of earth materials on 5 or more acres of land.
Friends of Clark County, a local environmental group that has fought urban sprawl for decades, joined the neighbors’ efforts.
“The development would negatively impact future farming on the fill site,” Sue Marshall, the group’s president who owns a farm in the area, wrote in testimony to the county. “The soil classification of this property is Hillsboro Silt Loam. This is one of the best soils for growing crops and rated among the very highest for productivity.”
After the county approved the permit, neighbors filed an appeal, which appeared before county Land Use Hearings Examiner Daniel Kearns on Dec. 10. During the roughly three-hour hearing, the appellants argued that approval of the permit was based on several discrepancies with existing county policy.
Kearns would reject the appeal a few weeks later. But he noted that the owners appear to be planning a “dirt dump,” possibly from the numerous development projects in northern parts of the county.
“It’s huge,” Kearns said during the hearing. “My eyes popped out when I saw it too.”
320 truck trips a day
The owners of the site, NCNG LLC, purchased it in August 2019. The ownership group includes Nathan Cano of Cano Real Estate and Niall Glavin of Glavin Homes, both Vancouver-based companies.
When asked for comment, the ownership group’s attorney, Jamie Howsley, responded with a statement. Howsley said that the company has met the county’s requirement for the grading permit.
“The county staff agreed with our position, and so did the hearing examiner,” Howsley said. “The neighbors are entitled to process. But at the end of the day, we believe we have met the requisite criteria.”
It remains unclear how much material, exactly, will be brought to the site, and where the material would come from.
County land use officials have estimated that the grading would require about 320 truck trips per day on 179th Avenue. They said the road can handle that load.
“Regular traffic flow should not be greatly affected by trucks bringing fill material to the site,” the owners’ application states.
Neighbors have countered that the number of trucks would still present safety issues on 179th Street and that the trucks might also use smaller, less durable, roads in the area. County officials have said that, because they don’t know where the material would come from, discussion of use of smaller roads is “entirely speculative.”
At the Dec. 10 hearing, another attorney for the group, Armand Resto-Spotts, suggested that the owners might import less than 533,000 cubic yards.
“It’s not uncommon to come in for a grading permit proposal for an amount of fill that you typically do not meet in the end. It’s so that you don’t have to show up in another year and do this all over again,” Resto-Spotts said.
Lawsuit possible
The owners noted in the application that they have “considered building future single-family homes” at the site. If owners pursue that in the future, it could be considered an acceptable use of the property under county code.
Stay informed on what is happening in Clark County, WA and beyond for only
Residents are concerned, however, about the impacts on the neighborhood over the next several years.
They’ve hired a land use attorney and are awaiting a decision from county land use officials on a motion to reconsider the matter. If that motion fails, the case could go to Clark County Superior Court.
“We believe that the county is not asking the right questions with this,” Dingethal said. “We don’t believe it’s a simple grading permit.”
Morning Briefing Newsletter
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.