A major way would be to use the deal as a guide, not by replicating it but by reversing it, by trying to prevent what it now promotes, namely a nuclear-armed Iran conceivably wiping out Israel, instigating nuclear proliferation, hegemonic ambitions and threatening the United States, even conceivably starting World War III.
Here are some of the things to change.
One: Take away the means necessary for Iran to create nuclear weapons. That would mean taking away all the centrifuges it now says it wants just to generate nuclear power. The deal says it can use the centrifuges only at low rates sufficient for that purpose, but that hardly means it can’t break the rules. Right now Iran, an oil-rich country that does not need nuclear power, is enriching well beyond the deal’s limits.
Two: Quit financing the killing of innocents as Iran remains the largest terrorist-sponsoring state in the world. Because it is just about nuclear weapons, the deal does nothing about militia terrorism recently employed in a rocket attack on a U.S. military base in Iraq. Obama actually forked over $1.7 billion of encouragement after the deal was completed. Earlier than that, he returned multibillions of Iranian assets frozen because of aggressive enmity. Even if the dollars did not go directly to Iran’s terrorist friends, they were obviously an enabler along with lifted sanctions in a country still holding American hostages.
Three: Have real inspections. At the moment, they are pretty much limited to nuclear facilities when they should be all over the place without perplexing procedures, such as in military bases. The United States and some other signatories have wanted to search them, but Iran says no, never. Photos have been taken of an object in the desert that experts believe could become a long-range missile capable of reaching the United States, but no inspections are allowed under the deal, according to The New York Times.