<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  November 23 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Northwest

State auditor: Seattle’s award of no-bid contract ‘concerning’

City council used ‘only bare minimum of accountability’

By David Gutman, The Seattle Times
Published: August 24, 2021, 7:25pm

SEATTLE — Seattle exercised “only the bare minimum of accountability and transparency” last year when the Seattle City Council awarded a $3 million no-bid contract to conduct the Black Brilliance Project, a research project meant to identify public safety spending priorities as the city looked at defunding the police, the Washington state auditor reported Monday.

State Auditor Pat McCarthy, as part of the city’s annual accountability audit, examined the contract, which the city council awarded last year in response to widespread protests of systemic racism and biased policing.

McCarthy, in a statement accompanying the audit, faulted the city, while noting that the contract “did not technically violate the relevant rules.”

“The audit determined the process the city used to award the contract was concerning,” McCarthy’s office wrote.

“In order to create trust in government, it is incumbent on public servants to establish clear, fair and open processes for the actions we take, especially when they use public dollars,” McCarthy said. “Taking a few more steps to define the terms of the contract and justify the process used to award it could have addressed public concerns.”

Mayor objected to cost

The contract, awarded by the city council over the veto of Mayor Jenny Durkan, was among the most expensive consultant contracts the city has given out in recent memory. Durkan, in her veto message last fall, wrote that much of the work in the contract could be done for “much less money.”

The contract was awarded without being put out for bids, as the Seattle City Council moved quickly last year to cut police funding in the midst of protests. It was initially intended to be awarded to King County Equity Now, a coalition of community groups that helped lead the summer’s protests and lobbied hard for the money. But because it was a new organization and not yet technically a nonprofit, King County Equity Now did not meet contracting guidelines.

Instead, the contract was awarded to Freedom Project, a low-profile nonprofit that runs nonviolent communication classes at jails and prisons. King County Equity Now was then hired as a subcontractor, and Freedom Project was hired as a sub-subcontractor. The partnership ended in an acrimonious breakup earlier this year, with King County Equity Now shut out of the process.

Details lacking

McCarthy’s office faulted the city council for not specifying, in detail, what the contract should deliver. Instead, the city council asked for four broad “deliverables” which were summarized on one page: executing the contract itself, outlining the project plan, a preliminary report and a final report.

“The City did not specify how the money would be spent, including requirements on administrative costs; a method for compensating community participants; research methodology requirements; and details on how the City would use the results,” McCarthy’s office wrote in a letter accompanying the audit.

McCarthy’s office found that the contract was “specifically directed” to King County Equity Now, before the contract was even awarded.

It also found that Freedom Project subcontracted out its obligations under the contract, without prior written consent from the city, in violation of the contract.

Stay informed on what is happening in Clark County, WA and beyond for only
$9.99/mo

City Councilmembers Tammy Morales, Lisa Herbold, Teresa Mosqueda and M. Lorena González chose, in November, to award the contract to Freedom Project, without putting it out for bids.

In a written statement, through a spokesperson, the four councilmembers said they welcomed the auditor’s report, noting it found no violations.

“We appreciate the recommendations contained in the management letter on how we can improve our contracting processes and look forward to working with the Mayor and her Executive team on improving citywide policies on contracting,” the councilmembers said.

‘Confusion and conflict’

Durkan, through a spokesperson, said the council’s process “led to confusion and conflict in the community.”

“As outlined in her veto, Mayor Durkan had significant concerns with the City Council’s process,” spokesperson Kamaria Hightower wrote. “While Mayor Durkan’s decision was unpopular at the time, this work to elevate BIPOC voices was too important to get wrong.”

King County Equity Now criticized Durkan, whose administration had written to the auditor, asking questions about the contract.

“The investigations’ clear, foreseeable findings confirming legality should serve as another indictment on her tenure,” the organization said.

The end result of the contract, the Black Brilliance Research Project Report, runs nearly 1,300 pages, although the vast majority of the report, more than 1,100 pages, consists of older publications or subcontractors’ reports, reprinted as appendices.

Loading...