<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Sunday,  November 17 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Westneat: Weighing role of ‘coronavirus gap’

By Danny Westneat
Published: September 30, 2020, 6:01am

Know anyone who has had the coronavirus?

This simple question, more than six months into the pandemic, may turn out to be the key to what’s driving politics this year, and could powerfully swing the upcoming elections.

Pollsters have been asking it in Washington state and around the nation lately, and the results say a lot about empathy and what drives people’s voting choices (particularly among the group that’s likely to prove most pivotal in this election, women).

Recently, pollsters at Seattle’s Strategies 360 put out the first post-primary political reading on our state, for KOMO 4. It had no real campaign surprises, finding Democrats such as Gov. Jay Inslee and presidential candidate Joe Biden winning our blue state handily.

Mostly overlooked though were two follow-up questions: Have you been diagnosed with COVID-19? Or has someone you know had COVID-19?

Only 2 percent answered yes to the first — a result that roughly matches the state infection rate that the CDC has estimated in serology studies for Washington.

But 47 percent say they do know someone who has been infected. And this group could hardly be more different, in their views on the pandemic and on politics right now, than the 49 percent who say they don’t know anyone who has had COVID-19 (the other 4 percent answered “not sure”).

Example: The biggest issue with Jay Inslee in this election is whether you think he’s handled the coronavirus crisis well. Has he met the moment? Or has he overreacted, stifling the state with obsessive and sometimes confusing restrictions?

When you ask people who know someone who caught coronavirus, Inslee’s got a 30-percentage point lead. It’s only a 3-point lead among those who don’t.

This gap is even wider when it comes to Donald Trump. When asked whether they approve of Trump’s handling of the pandemic, the group that knows someone diagnosed with COVID-19 gives him the thumbs down by a 48-point margin. But among the half of the state that doesn’t know any COVID-19 sufferers, Trump’s disapproval margin is only minus seven.

These same sorts of results show up in national polls, though they’re not as dramatic.

Some of this is doubtless explainable by geography and demographics. Voters in some rural areas are probably less likely to have brushed against the coronavirus than city dwellers, and were already predisposed to like Trump or disapprove of Inslee before COVID-19 came to town.

But the coronavirus has slowly worked its way into all parts of America. In the poll of our state, 47 percent of Eastern Washington registered voters reported knowing someone who has contracted COVID-19; the figure is 58 percent in King County.

We’ve heard all about the gender gap in politics. Call this the coronavirus gap, or maybe an empathy gap.

It’s revealing that these polls also show the largest gender gaps I’ve ever seen. Men are roughly split on Inslee’s performance on the pandemic, with 49 to 44 percent approval. But women approve of his cautious, mask-wearing approach by 42 points, 68 to 26 percent. As a result, Inslee is losing right now among the men of the state to his little-known GOP opponent, small-town Republic police Chief Loren Culp, by 2 points overall. But he’s dominating among female voters by an unprecedented 33 percentage points.

Gender splits in politics typically are 10 points, not 30. I’ve written before about how this health care crisis elicits a different set of emotional responses than did more stereotypically “masculine” crises like wars. And so the coronavirus may be polarizing the electorate more than usual along gender lines.

Empathy has long been a political selling point. Bill Clinton felt our pain, George W. Bush was the compassionate conservative. It’s been out of style in our hard-nosed, partisan politics recently, though.

Maybe the story of 2020 is that it’s making a quiet comeback, sparked by an invisible scourge and then propelled by women, in this year to otherwise forget.

Loading...