<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday,  November 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Camas pool not essential

By Tim Hein, Camas
Published: September 25, 2019, 6:00am

Seventy-eight million dollars. An incredibly large request for an all-or-nothing bond measure that combines a community center complete with aquatics center and upgrades to current sports fields. In 2018, the original cost of replacement for an aquatics center to support sports teams and youth swimming lessons was between $4 million to $5 million, and $6 million for sport fields. The new proposal is a facility that includes a three-story building with fitness center, multipool aquatics center, and additional meeting rooms. The cost of this facility is expected to add approximately $500 in taxes to the annual tax burden of the median home price of $471,000 in Camas. This $500 will fund the building of the community center but will not include usage fees that are needed for operating and maintenance costs.

Another important consideration is tax priorities and the limits that residents can pay. Our taxes support essential services provided by our city for roads, infrastructure and continued growth. Other spending priorities include the current and anticipated replacement school bond/levy requests. These are essential, and increased funding for a $78 million community center directly competes with these tax priorities.

Taxes should be used to support essential city services, schools, and green space, not an elaborate community center. This request needs to be reduced down to the essential services that our community needs, and can afford.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...