<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  November 20 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Saunders: Cohen hearing no coup for Dems

By Debra Saunders
Published: March 5, 2019, 6:01am

At one point during his hours of testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform last week, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney and “fixer” Michael Cohen was asked what “breaking point” prompted him to split with Trump.

“There were several factors,” Cohen responded. “Helsinki” — a reference to Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin last year — “Charlottesville” — think Trump’s racially insensitive decision to blame “many sides” for the death of an activist protesting white nationalism — and “watching the daily destruction of our civility to one another.”

Many House Democrats clearly wanted to believe that Trump’s onetime tough-guy enforcer had found enlightenment, but their desire to take Cohen’s side did them no credit.

The more likely breaking point came on April 9, 2018, when FBI agents raided Cohen’s home, office and New York hotel room. Cohen was facing 65 years in prison as prosecutors dangled felony counts that included charges of tax evasion and lying to Congress.

By cutting a plea deal, Cohen reduced his prison time to three years.

Cohen admitted to the committee that he will try to get that sentence reduced further. So, the worst he can expect from Wednesday’s performance is that if he serves the whole 36 months, he can walk out of prison a hero for gullible Democrats.

Republicans have no such hero right now. All but the die-hard base know Trump’s warts too well.

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who endorsed Trump for president when he dropped out of the GOP primary in 2016, noted the problem when he told ABC News, “There hasn’t been one Republican yet who’s tried to defend the president on the substance.”

There is no grand defense for Trump. You can say only that there is no grand case against him.

The two campaign contribution violations to which Cohen pleaded guilty are dicey at best. They were the first criminal charges brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller that involved the 2016 Trump campaign, but by a dubious route.

Because Cohen paid off porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy Bunny Karen McDougal to keep them from talking about their alleged affairs during the Trump campaign, the feds argued, that made the hush money illegal campaign donations.

Problem: A jury wouldn’t convict former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., after a big donor paid to cover up an affair Edwards had with an aide that produced a child. It’s hard to see the illegality in Cohen paying hush money with his own money and Trump reimbursing him.

No gung-ho defense

Still, there’s no place for a gung-ho defense. Trump denies having been involved with Daniels and McDougal, yet even his die-hard base doesn’t believe it. The affairs and payoffs do not speak well of his judgment. So really, who can get outraged because Cohen called Trump a “con man” and a “cheat”?

Cohen also called Trump a racist, an angle picked up by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., who complained that Department of Housing and Urban Development official Lynne Patton attended the hearing as a guest of Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., as a “prop,” she said, which is “racist in itself.”

You see, Patton is black, and it’s perfectly fine for Democrats to call African-Americans props, as if they are unable to act on their own, because black Americans cannot possibly be thinking for themselves if they lean to the right.

Democrats pretty much have abandoned their quest to prove Trump colluded with Russia. They did make it clear that Trump’s choice of associates has room for improvement.

And for that — a hearing that provided the same meager revelations as the Republican hearings of the previous two years — Democrats scheduled an event tailor-made to distract Trump as he was in Hanoi trying to ply denuclearization concessions from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

Trump walked away from a bad deal with the hermit kingdom, but voters are stuck at the table.

Debra J. Saunders is a Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist. dsaunders@reviewjournal.com; Twitter.com/DebraJSaunders

Loading...