<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  November 27 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Editorials

In Our View: Public lands legislation a victory for lawmaking

The Columbian
Published: February 17, 2019, 6:03am

A bill spearheaded by Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., and passed Tuesday by the Senate provides crucial environmental protections to wilderness areas throughout the country. Equally important, it represents the return of negotiation and compromise in Congress.

The Natural Resources Management Act passed 92-8 and now moves into the House of Representatives, where it is expected to have broad bipartisan support. And The Washington Post reports that White House officials have indicated President Donald Trump will sign the bill if it lands on his desk. The legislation designates 1.3 million acres of new wilderness areas and 694,000 acres of new recreation and conservation areas, while also creating four new national monuments and protecting the areas of some current monuments.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said: “It touches every state, features the input of a wide coalition of our colleagues, and has earned the support of a broad, diverse coalition of many advocates for public lands, economic development, and conservation.” Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office calculates that the legislation will save taxpayers $9 billion, which drew support from fiscal conservatives.

Hailed as the most significant conservation legislation in at least a decade, the bill includes numerous provisions directly impacting Washington. One would improve volcano early warning and monitoring systems. Another would remove 340,000 acres in northern Washington’s Upper Methow Valley from consideration for mining permits. And another would permanently reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which since 1964 has used royalties from oil and gas permits for the protections of wilderness areas; the fund has been become a political football in recent years and its authorization is currently lapsed. The legislation also includes several provisions increasing access for hunters and anglers.

In an era when President Trump has repeatedly promoted the development of public lands and has scaled back safeguards put in place by his predecessors, the legislation reflects the public’s broad support for protected wilderness. As The Washington Post reported, Tuesday’s vote “represented an old-fashioned approach to deal-making that has largely disappeared on Capitol Hill. Senators from across the ideological spectrum celebrated home-state gains and congratulated each other for bridging the partisan divide.”

Cantwell deserves much of the credit for that. The legislation has been years in the making, eventually bringing together more than 100 separate bills related to public lands, water and natural resources. Cantwell said: “There’s some corners that tried to demonize access to public lands as, ‘Oh, that’s just some environmentalists, and that’s it.’ And that’s not it. It’s way bigger than that.” Co-author Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said, “We have also worked for months on a bipartisan, bicameral basis to truly negotiate every single word of this bill.”

In many ways, the bill represents Congress at its best. Sweeping legislation requires time and negotiation and compromise; neither party has a monopoly on good ideas. In this case, the process created a coalition that held together despite efforts by critics to add amendments that could have diminished support for the final bill.

Protection of public lands typically has broad support among Americans — particularly in the West, where much of our heritage is linked to outdoor recreation and exploration. The Natural Resources Management Act reflects that support.

Loading...