Three vie for Clark County Council chair

Whomever voters pick to be Clark County Council chair will have some big challenges ahead that include budget shortfalls, a housing shortage, homelessness, growth planning, charter implementation and others.

In the race, incumbent Chair Marc Boldt, an independent, is facing challenges from Republican Clark County Councilor Eileen Quiring and political newcomer Eric Holt, a Democrat. Christy Stanley, a Democrat, has suspended her campaign and endorsed Holt.

In advance of the Aug. 7 primary (the top two candidates will square off in November), The Columbian sent the candidates a questionnaire asking where they stand on the issues. Below are their responses, which have been edited for clarity and brevity. Their complete responses can be found at columbian.com.

The Clark County Council chair has the same voting power as the four other members of the council. What power does the Clark County Council chair position really have, and how do you intend to use it?

Marc Boldt (I): In some ways, the chair has less power. You only have a personal opinion until the vote. After that, you speak for the council regardless of your vote. The job of this position, if done correctly, is to serve all the council as well as the other electeds.

Eric Holt (D): As chair, I will work with the council to set a vision and mission, create regular meeting agendas and hold the meetings in accordance of the charter requirements and work with the state and local jurisdictions to form a more cohesive and cooperative operation.

Eileen Quiring (R): As the spokesperson for the county, it is important that we have a chair that can articulate our priorities and encourage an agenda that places citizens at the front of the line. The chair can be a catalyst for policies that encourage job creators and that meet the needs of our community without adding unwarranted burdens onto the citizens.

What is the single biggest challenge facing the county?

Boldt: The remodel of our jail is the most important issue.

Holt: Lack of effective leadership. This in turn leads to a failure in the county’s ability to address the truly pressing issues.

Quiring: We must have land use policies that do not contribute to the high cost of housing. And we have to plan for adequate infrastructure to accommodate that growth.

Clark County is experiencing a structural deficit where revenues outpace expenditures. This is happening at a time when the county is experiencing rapid growth and an increased demand for services. What are your specific plans to address the situation?

Boldt: First, there are only a few counties in the state with stable budgets. With that said, the most important issue is a balanced budget with enough reserves for tough times. The state legislature must start funding items mandated by the laws they have passed such as growth management, indigent defense and more.

Holt: My family going back four generations were blue collar union Democrats. We earned our income by the sweat of our brow and the strength in our backs.

Quiring: I am a Republican because my values most closely align with the Republican platform of lean and efficient government, which adheres to the statutory requirements of state law, lower taxes, property rights and respect for individual freedom and liberty.

When is it appropriate for the county government to increase taxes or fees on citizens?

Boldt: We must first take time to build a budget meeting the needs of citizens, but realizing that citizens pay for the entire budget. If at the end you have a deficit, you can look for ways to meet the challenge of funding through taxes or fees.

Holt: Taxes should be increased by the vote of the people or where designated by the Washington state constitution. Fee increases should be increased in accordance with inflation and limited to the cost of living increase for that particular area.

Quiring: In the case of a genuine emergency, it could be appropriate to raise taxes or fees, however that should be a last resort. Overspending or poor planning is not a good reason.

If you could make one change to the state’s Growth Management Act, which requires Clark County to plan for future growth, what would it be?

Boldt: To limit the control of the Growth Management Hearings Board and make it easier to go straight to court for a final outcome saving time for everyone.

Holt: I would consider making the county manager an elected office with requirements for experience and education.

Quiring: I did not initially favor the charter form of government. The charter did put in place a mechanism for citizens to make changes, so we will see what comes of that over time.

The Clark County Jail has become overcrowded and outmoded for modern correctional practices. How should the county address the problem?

Boldt: I helped create a citizen task force to look at the remodel of the jail and the operation of the facility. I am committed to see changes in our jail.

Holt: Clark County and the surrounding cities should work with the Building Industry Association and others to develop a plan to increase the number of multi-family residences inside the Urban Growth Boundaries. There is a lot of contributing factors to homelessness, mental health, substance abuse, lack of living wage jobs.

Quiring: County government through Community Services and many nonprofits are in a partnership to work on this problem. This collaboration is very important to find long-term solutions.

Should the county lift its ban on recreational marijuana? If so, what should be done with the tax revenue?

Boldt: No. We need more information about the effects on our health.

Holt: Yes. Revenue could be put toward the looming budget shortfall, drug and alcohol treatment and enforcement, homelessness, and improving services to the citizens of Clark County.

Quiring: I am not in favor of lifting the ban in the unincorporated area of Clark County. Any extra revenue generated would have to be funneled back into law enforcement and social services.