It has been 108 days since Stephen Paddock rained gunfire upon a concert-going crowd in Las Vegas and killed 58 people. Since then, Congress has considered the South Carolina Peanut Parity Act and the Ceiling Fan Energy Conservation Harmonization Act, but has done little to acknowledge that firearms annually result in more than 30,000 deaths in the United States.
Because of this head-in-the-sand attitude at the national level, the Legislature is wise to consider a proactive approach to the scourge that is gun violence. This country’s inability to address such a damaging public health issue represents a shameful commentary on our priorities.
Consider the issue of bump stocks, which officials say contributed to the carnage in Las Vegas. The killer used the trigger modification, which allows a semi-automatic weapon to act as a machine gun, in perpetrating the most deadly mass shooting in recent U.S. history. Following the Las Vegas massacre, there was much public attention given to bump stocks, with Congress vowing action and the National Rifle Association favoring some sort of limitation on the devices. For the NRA, it was an acknowledgement that bump stocks are the low-hanging fruit of gun control and that limitations had widespread support. But as the furor died down, the issue quietly disappeared. Out of sight, out of mind, easily ignored by lawmakers.
Since then, Congress has spent time on the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, which would allow people with concealed-carry permits to carry weapons in any state regardless of that state’s laws. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground, voted in favor of the legislation, which passed the House of Representatives and was sent along to the Senate. Congress responded to the Las Vegas massacre not by considering common-sense gun legislation, but by working to ease gun control. The incongruity is mind-boggling.