Dear Mr. Berko: Please tell us your thoughts on Starbucks. We are retired and have a good income from our investments, though we still must be careful. We don’t want to make investments that might be aggressive and lose money. There’s a Starbucks near where we live, and we’re thinking of buying 200 shares. There’s always a long line inside in the morning. It’s also busy in the evening, and I’ve often waited 10 (annoying) minutes or more for a barista to fill my order, which I take home to my husband, who’s in a wheelchair. I think other Starbucks locations are equally busy.
We got taken several years ago and lost $2,100 on IBM. That was a terrible experience. Is Starbucks a conservative stock? Does it have safe appreciation potential?
— K.L., Jonesboro, Ark.
Dear K.L.: I know that losing money is like stepping on a snake, but there’s no such thing as “safe appreciation potential.” Starbucks (SBUX-$61) is competing with Tim Hortons, McDonald’s, Dunkin’ Donuts, Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Caribou Coffee and even Hooters. And unless their coffee tastes like crude oil, there’s little to discourage consumers from patronizing other chains.
SBUX has been in my thoughts since October 2015, when I waited for 14 maddening minutes to buy a large fancy-schmancy low-calorie latte from a barista who had more tattoos than teeth. Last year, SBUX, with 12,864 stores and 254,000 employees, recorded $21.3 billion in revenues peddling coffee, sweets, sandwiches and brewing appliances. Founder Howard Schultz, who worships the Roman goddess Caffeina, took SBUX public in 1992 at $17 a share and owns 38 million shares. His average cost is 17 cents a share after six splits.