<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 29 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Editorials

In Our View: Work to Heal Health Care

GOP should heed Herrera Beutler, take collaborative approach to improve law

The Columbian
Published: July 20, 2017, 6:03am

Although President Donald Trump declared earlier this year that, “Nobody knew health care could be so complicated,” the difficulty in repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act is obvious to all who understand the issue. This is particularly true in Washington, where the state’s 1990s wrangling over health care contained parallels to the current travails of Congress.

So, while Trump reacted Tuesday by saying his new plan is to “let Obamacare fail,” that should not be regarded as a viable option. Instead, the Republican-controlled Congress should come up with an improved idea or strive to make the health care overhaul passed in 2010 work for the American people.

Republicans spent the final seven years of the Obama presidency decrying the Affordable Care Act, knowing that their efforts to repeal the legislation would be vetoed if sent to the White House. Now that they are in charge, reality has thrown cold water on that rhetoric. Republican plans to replace Obamacare have proven widely unpopular with the public, and late Monday the latest effort was scuttled when three Republican senators declared their opposition. By Tuesday, a plan to simply repeal the Affordable Care Act and spend two years crafting a replacement — conveniently carrying them past the 2018 midterm elections — was quickly rebuffed.

Complaining, it has been demonstrated, is easy; governing is hard.

In that regard, the situation is similar to what Washington endured beginning in 1993. A law signed by then-Gov. Mike Lowry made the state the first to require residents to have health insurance and required employers to offer coverage. Republicans campaigned against what they said was government overreach and gained control of the Legislature before setting out to overturn the law. But, as Pam MacEwan, who served on the commission implementing the law, told the Los Angeles Times this year: “It’s much easier to break something. It’s more difficult to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. … And that’s when people get hurt.”

In dismantling pieces of The Health Services Act, the Legislature threw the insurance market into chaos. Gov. Gary Locke, who was elected in 1996, responded to the crisis by bringing together insurance executives, legislators, and other stakeholders to craft a solution.

That should serve as a lesson for congressional leaders. As Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Battle Ground, told The Columbian’s Editorial Board in April, Republicans should “hold hearings, invite providers in, invite groups in, take testimony, get feedback, get buy-in, build coalitions.” Herrera Beutler ended up being one of 20 Republicans in the House of Representatives to vote against her party’s bill to replace Obamacare.

Thus far, Republicans have demonstrated no desire to get buy-in and build coalitions, instead creating replacement plans in secret and then pushing for a quick vote before those plans wilt under scrutiny.

With congressional leaders now at a loss for how to proceed, some stratagems should be embraced. First, hearings should be held; Obamacare underwent more than a year of debate and amendments. Second, Congress must provide stability by offering incentives for insurers to enter underserved markets and guaranteeing that a viable system will be in place for the long term — whether it is Obamacare or a replacement. Insurers are leaving the market because of uncertainty, not because the system is broken.

None of that will be easy. Then again, just about everybody knew health care was complicated.

Loading...