The opioid crisis facing the United States is dire.
“With approximately 142 Americans dying every day, America is enduring a death toll equal to Sept. 11 every three weeks,” notes a preliminary report from a panel formed by President Donald Trump to study the situation. That reality hits home in the Northwest, with Attorney General Bob Ferguson saying in June, “We have a huge, huge problem in Washington. We have two people each day die of an overdose of opioids.”
Yet with the abuse of both prescription and illicit drugs affecting families, the reality is butting up against ideology in Washington, D.C. While the federal panel led by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie recommends that Trump declare a national emergency and that Medicaid spending be increased, Republicans are attempting to slash such spending. Threats to trim Medicaid or repeal the Affordable Care Act run counter to Trump’s promises to deal with the nation’s opioid crisis, but the lesson is clear: Cutting funding will have a profound cost.
For many, that is a cost they are willing to bear. Critics of spending on treatment often claim that addicts have brought the crisis upon themselves and that the public should not be burdened to pay for those actions. As a Missouri state senator callously said, when somebody dies of an overdose, that “just removes them from the gene pool.” Such opinions ignore the societal costs that accompany the crisis. In addition to delivering suffering upon American families, addiction also leads to increased crime and diminishes the vibrancy of our communities.
In this state, Gov. Jay Inslee last year used an executive order to bring together state agencies, public health organizations and law enforcement to combat the epidemic. This year, Inslee signed a bill designed to improve communication between medical providers regarding prescriptions and overdoses. The bill, which passed the Senate 49-0 and passed the House 88-8, provides a little more than $1 million in funding for the program.