<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 29 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Check Out Our Newsletters envelope icon
Get the latest news that you care about most in your inbox every week by signing up for our newsletters.
News / Business / Columnists

Berko: Subprime auto lending shifting into high gear

By Malcolm Berko
Published: February 21, 2016, 5:59am

Dear Mr. Berko: We have a $37,000 CD coming due at Wells Fargo. The teller introduced to a wealth adviser who advised us to invest $25,000 in an annuity, then $6,000 in General Motors and $6,000 in Ford. We know enough about annuities from reading your column to tell the wealth adviser to stick a carrot in his ear. We also know auto sales are going gangbusters and have never been as good. Will auto sales be as good in 2016? And if so, would Ford and GM be good to buy?

— T.M., Columbus, Ohio

Dear T.M.: The culture at Wells Fargo (WFC-$48) isn’t to be better or effective at what they do but to get bigger, to increase revenues, earnings and dividends every year. If WFC can’t, then CEO John Stumpf, whose white mane is slicked back like cake frosting and who made $20 million last year, risks being replaced, as do his acolytes. Customers must be careful when visiting a WFC branch because management developed a sales culture that can be injurious to your wealth.

I’ve never liked nor ever recommended Ford, Chrysler or General Motors (GM-$28). And like the airline industry, I will never invest in a sector in which a union can so easily bully management, close shop doors, stop production, require $10,000 signing bonuses and demand employees earn $65 an hour. That’s $130,000 a year. A cop in Florida with 20 years earns $53,000, and a quantum physics professor only makes $72,000. There are other reasons I’d not own either issue.

Today, there are millions of unsold and never-to-be-sold new and used cars squatting on dealer lots and packed tighter than pickles in a Mason jar. And if their prices are determined by supply and demand, Americans are grossly overpaying for their cars. The industry expects a record number of cars, probably 18 million, to be sold this year. Dealerships across the country are deluged with excess inventory. And to prevent this flood from sinking prices, the industry has “encouraged” lenders to lower their standards. According to the New York FED, more than $126 billion of auto loans between June and December of 2015 were made to borrowers with credit scores below 660. That’s called subprime because acceptable credit scores are 720 or higher. Some $81 billion of those were auto loans made to borrowers with credit scores below 620, and many of them were made for 8 years. Heck, my two dogs, Abbott and Costello, have earned better credit scores.

Analysts alarmed

It seems that subprime auto lending is shifting into high gear and raising concerns in Washington. A growing number of savvy analysts are alarmed that consumer borrowing reached an all-time high of $3.8 trillion (doesn’t include mortgages) in November. This suggests that the GDP has been goosed higher by consumer debt and these consumers make less today than they did before the recession. Washington isn’t concerned about the health of the nation’s auto lending portfolio

Washington wants the consumer to spend and is making it easier for the consumer to increase his debt. Many home mortgages are being made without a down payment and without documentation or personal earnings statements. And those mortgages are as easy to get today as they were 10 years ago. According to the New York Fed, the national mortgage delinquency rate is 3.2 percent and in some states (Florida, Arizona, South Carolina, New Mexico) it exceeds 6.3 percent. Some of the Fed’s top data analysts are shouting that the national default rate could double by early 2017. No one is listening.

The consensus of the Street’s analysts believe Ford’s (F-$12) 2016 revenues will increase to $145 billion from $139 billion while share earnings increase to $1.97 from $1.60. That’s good. And those same geniuses project a median 2016 target price of $16. So Goldman Sachs rates F as a BUY. The consensus of analysts following GM project 2016 revenues at $151 billion, with last year’s at $149 billion and a median target of $38.50. However, Goldman recently downgraded GM from a BUY to a “neutral,” whatever “neutral” means. I wouldn’t buy either. And I doubt the consumer has enough “borrow juice” left to afford a new car this year.


 

Malcolm Berko addresses questions about stocks. Reach him at P.O. Box 8303, Largo, FL 33775 or mjberko@yahoo.com.

Loading...