What the heck was William Shakespeare thinking?
The Renaissance poet and playwright, 1564-1616, was years ahead of his time in probing modern problems: existential uncertainty in “Hamlet,” racism and bigotry in “Othello” and “The Merchant of Venice,” political ambition in “Macbeth.” And across many plays, from “Much Ado About Nothing” to “Measure for Measure,” Shakespeare shows unmistakable sympathy for the plight of strong, smart women in a world ruled by men.
But then there’s “The Taming of the Shrew.”
It’s no exaggeration to call its subject the battle between the sexes. The three-day run of the play that wraps up at 6 p.m. Saturday in the courtyard at the Vancouver School of Arts and Academics features expertly choreographed, slightly alarming physical combat between Petruchio, the scheming husband, and Katherine, his unruly and dangerous bride. Petruchio’s strategy is to best Katherine at her game of absurd nastiness, and he sure succeeds. Katherine’s bad behavior is essentially tortured out of her via starvation, sleep deprivation and mental trickery, and she shrinks from roaring tiger to humble kitten:
“I am ashamed that women are so simple
To offer war where they should kneel for peace;
Or seek for rule, supremacy and sway,
When they are bound to serve, love and obey.”
Petruchio rewards this by inviting Katherine to bed. The end.
“The Taming of the Shrew” is certainly Shakespeare’s most controversial work. “I strongly disagree with everything she just said,” was one student’s reaction to that final monologue, according to director and VSAA drama teacher Seth Olson.
“At first I was kind of upset about the way women are treated in this play,” said leading lady and rising senior Courtney Wilmington, 17, who plays Katherine. “But I took it as a challenge” both to honor the norms of Shakespeare’s time — and to gain a deeper understanding of these characters as individuals, not just generic symbols of conflict.