<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  October 31 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Business / Clark County Business

County councilors vote to delay decision on growth plan

By Katie Gillespie, Columbian Education Reporter
Published: October 20, 2015, 10:34am

Update: The Clark County council voted to delay its decision on the preferred alternative, putting the final decision off to Nov. 24. Visit Columbian.com this evening for full coverage of today’s county council meeting.

The fate of zoning in rural Clark County rests today in the hands of the county councilors.

After months of deliberating and planning, the council will vote on its preferred alternative to the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, a 20-year plan for population and job growth in Clark County. The issue to watch will be Alternative 4, a proposal by Councilor David Madore that would allow for smaller rural, agriculture and forest lots across rural Clark County.

Though the planning commission rejected smaller lots, including all of Alternative 4, in its recommendations to the county council last month, Madore appears intent on pursuing the plan. Some rural land owners say the ability to subdivide their property into smaller lots will grant them more freedom, but the plan has been criticized by a gamut of public officials and private citizens, including farmers, city officials and land-use attorneys. Acting County Manager Mark McCauley recently revealed that Madore was developing his own version of the county’s preferred alternative behind closed doors.

No details of that plan have been released, but two unsigned, unsourced documents appeared on the county’s website Tuesday morning that may hint to Madore’s plan. The documents criticized the supplemental draft environmental impact statement that analyzes the growth plan, saying it used a number of “unrealistic assumptions.”

The document also calls for the county to plan for more growth. In 2013, the council, using projections from the state Office of Financial Management, directed county staff to plan for a population of 562,207 by 2035. Instead, the document recommends the council consider planning for a population of 681,134 by 2035, the Office of Financial Management’s highest population projection.

Follow Columbian reporter Kaitlin Gillespie here or on Twitter as she covers this morning’s council meeting live.

Loading...
Columbian Education Reporter