U.S. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Camas, did not vote with her colleagues Wednesday who moved to block the federal government from interfering with states that allow the use of medical marijuana.
Through a spokeswoman, Herrera Beutler said she voted against the measure because of the route it took to the U.S. House floor. The provision is part of a spending bill. It would prevent the U.S. Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration from using federal funds to go after states that allow for the use of medical marijuana.
“Jaime supports individuals’ safe, monitored use of medical marijuana to address health-related symptoms. The difference between federal and state law on that issue has created a conflict that she believes deserves a carefully crafted correction to federal law.
“However, that can’t happen in the narrow scope and limited debate of the appropriations process,” Amy Pennington, Herrera Beutler’s spokeswoman, wrote in an email.
U.S. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Camas, did not vote with her colleagues Wednesday who moved to block the federal government from interfering with states that allow the use of medical marijuana.
Through a spokeswoman, Herrera Beutler said she voted against the measure because of the route it took to the U.S. House floor. The provision is part of a spending bill. It would prevent the U.S. Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration from using federal funds to go after states that allow for the use of medical marijuana.
"Jaime supports individuals' safe, monitored use of medical marijuana to address health-related symptoms. The difference between federal and state law on that issue has created a conflict that she believes deserves a carefully crafted correction to federal law.
"However, that can't happen in the narrow scope and limited debate of the appropriations process," Amy Pennington, Herrera Beutler's spokeswoman, wrote in an email.
— Lauren Dake
— Lauren Dake
WASHINGTON — The federal government would be unable to block state laws permitting the use of medical marijuana under legislation approved Wednesday by the GOP-controlled House.
But lawmakers narrowly rejected an amendment that would stop the Justice Department from interfering with states like Colorado and Washington that permit the recreational use of marijuana.
The 242-186 vote on medical pot was a larger margin than a tally last year, when the House first approved it as part of a bill funding the Justice Department. Wednesday’s vote was to renew the pro-pot language as part of a bill providing funding for the coming fiscal year. The overall measure passed by a mostly party-line vote.
Most Republicans opposed the idea and the Senate is in GOP hands this year, so the outcome could still be reversed. But Senate advocates of medical marijuana won a test vote in the GOP-controlled Appropriations Committee last month.
On Wednesday, 67 Republicans, including libertarian-minded lawmakers such as Thomas Massie of Kentucky, combined with all but a handful of Democrats in support of states that allow doctors to prescribe pot for medical uses, such as improving the appetites of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Almost half the states allow medical marijuana, which remains an illegal drug under federal law. But the federal government has adopted a hands-off approach to states that have adopted lenient marijuana laws. The Justice Department has issued guidance to governors in such states — including the four that have enacted laws permitting pot possession for recreational use — that it won’t challenge those laws so long as marijuana is tightly regulated.
“The medical marijuana train has definitely left the station,” said Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore.
The government is instead focusing on preventing distribution to minors and keeping pot profits from going to organized criminal enterprises. Still, marijuana is a Schedule I drug under a landmark 1970 drug law, meaning the government deems it to have “no currently accepted medical use” and a “high potential for abuse.”
The Treasury Department has also issued guidance intended to clarify that financial institutions can offer services to businesses that dispense marijuana, though industry advocates say most banks are still reluctant to do so for fear of prosecution.
The amendment to allow recreational pot use, offered by conservative Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., was rejected by a surprisingly narrow 222-206 vote. McClintock’s measure had less GOP support and more Democratic opposition than did the amendment on medical marijuana.
“This is not an argument for or against marijuana,” McClintock said. “This strictly involves the rights of citizen in various states to regulate commerce that occurs entirely within their own borders.”
Voters in Alaska and Oregon last year approved ballot measures legalizing marijuana, bringing the number of states permitting legal pot possession to four.
Opponents say marijuana remains dangerous even as laws get more lenient.
“A study recently found that even casual users experience severe brain abnormalities … and that pot smoking leads to a loss of ambition, to lower IQs, and that it impairs attention, judgment, memory and many other things,” said Rep. John Fleming, R-La.
The underlying $51 billion spending bill only partially funds President Barack Obama’s request for new community policing initiatives, such as funding to help local police purchase body cameras to record their interactions with the people they’re assigned to protect.
