Ecologist Crisafulli has accompanied many student research trips and recalled an “Aha” moment when students understood the difference between lands actively managed versus lands that are recovering naturally.
Teeming with life
“They were shocked to see how resilient nature is, and if left alone, how a site could develop such an amazingly rich and complex ecosystem,” Crisafulli said. “They realized that while an active approach to management — salvage logging and subsequent planting — may yield a vigorous young stand of conifers that will undoubtedly have timber value down the road, it was otherwise a nearly sterile environment when compared to the passively managed sites that teemed with life.”
“There’s such a great story, a rich history, that it’s easy to get the kids interested,” said teacher Catlin. “The history, the geology, the biology, the ecology, how life returns from catastrophic disturbance.”
“Many students are awestruck by the raw power of the geological forces that were unleashed on May 18, 1980, and equally impressed and moved by the capacity of nature to rebound from such an intense insult,” said Crisafulli. “When they hear that the area they just entered was filled by a gigantic rockfall avalanche and then incinerated by a super-heated, stone-filled volcanic blast that removed every vestige of pre-eruption life and that every plant they see blowing in the wind, and every frog they hear chorusing, and every bird they hear singing, and insect the see flying, mammal they see scurrying, and every snake they see slithering somehow managed to arrive at the site, some hopping, some flying, some crawling, some burrowing, some hitchhiking on other organisms, it makes them stop and realize just how powerful nature is.”