<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  November 22 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Complaints of Whistling Ridge aired

The Columbian
Published: November 24, 2011, 4:00pm

Many Vancouver Audubon Society members and I oppose the proposed Whistling Ridge wind project near White Salmon. While we support wind energy in general, this particular proposal by the SDS Lumber Company fails on several counts. Their environmental impact statement has too little data about the migratory corridor under consideration. Owl nesting sites are in this area and eagles, hawks, songbirds and bats travel through this route as well. Additionally, this area is already a state-designated protection area for the spotted owl. The turbine blades turn at deceptively fast speeds, which birds are often unable to navigate. This causes avian fatalities.

Honest efforts have been made to draw the developer into discussion about realistic modifications, yet there has been no yield. SDS wants it all. The Washington Energy Facility Siting Council sent a recommendation to the governor reducing the size of the project. If it comes down to an “all or nothing” decision, let us hope the governor decides to end this project. We do not need one more poorly sited wind project. Let’s protect the avian population and the scenery in the Columbia Gorge.

Bob Rowe

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...